Solved

Calculating IOPS on physical server as virtualization candidate.

Posted on 2011-03-01
5
1,484 Views
Last Modified: 2012-08-14
I am working a project where I need to virtualize 30 existing physical servers.

I have collected perfmon data over the last week using logman including physical and logical disk counters.

I am currently looking at disk reads/sec and disk writes/sec, but these numbers aren't adding up to IOPS.    For example I have 1 server with a RAID1.  Perfmon says the reads/sec had an average of 6/sec over the last week, but the maximum was 656/second.   But this can't possibily be right if the maximum (without solid state drives) would be about 150-180/IOPS per second.

What microsoft counters can I use to calculate the average IOPS usage per logical or physical disk without having direct access to the physical hardware.
0
Comment
Question by:USWired
5 Comments
 
LVL 34

Expert Comment

by:Michael-Best
ID: 35011645
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:chkdsk01
chkdsk01 earned 250 total points
ID: 35011957
If you already have a vCenter server you can install the guided consolidation plugin.  This lets you monitor performance of physical servers and it will give you a confidence rating showing you if the servers are good virtualization candidates.  I wouldn't use this entirely to base my judgement, but it helps.
0
 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
Duncan Meyers earned 250 total points
ID: 35012410
You're on the right track. The most likely reason that you're seeing a peak of 656 IOPS on a mirrored pair is that RAID controller cache (or on-disk cache for that matter) has handle the peak workload.

You are correct regarding 150 to 180 IOPS But this is a sizing number. That is; your disks will handle 180 IOPS day in, day out without breaking a sweat. They'll handle up to 2 to 2.5 times that workload before response times become unacceptable, so you could see 360 to 450 IOPS per drive for 15k scsi or SAS drives.
0
 

Author Comment

by:USWired
ID: 35013137
Actually I found the numbers I was looking for which was Physical Disk - Disk Reads/sec and Disk Writes/sec as opposed to Logical Disk - Disk Reads/sec and Disk Writes/sec.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 35013185
Thanks! Glad I could help.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article, I will show you HOW TO: Perform a Physical to Virtual (P2V) Conversion the easy way from a computer backup (image).
Finding original email is quite difficult due to their duplicates. From this article, you will come to know why multiple duplicates of same emails appear and how to delete duplicate emails from Outlook securely and instantly while vital emails remai…
Teach the user how to configure vSphere Replication and how to protect and recover VMs Open vSphere Web Client: Verify vsphere Replication is enabled: Enable vSphere Replication for a virtual machine: Verify replicated VM is created: Recover replica…
This video shows you how easy it is to boot from ISO images for virtual machines with the ISO images stored on a local datastore on the ESXi host.

815 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

9 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now