Solved

Valid emails being deferred through Barracuda 100 Spam/Virus Firewall

Posted on 2011-03-01
3
2,259 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
We have a small business network with a Barracuda Spam Virus Firewall and over the past few months I have seen an increase in the number of deferred messages for valid email addresses.  It's not all emails for certain domains, in fact for one domain I have seen some come right through and others never make it.

Talked to Barracuda support, upgraded to the latest firmware, increased timeout, etc and they say it must be upstream.  I did some further testing by taking the firewall out of the mix while watching some specific deferred messages, and those messages dropped right through to Exchange, so I'm not convinced it's an upstream issue?

My configuration is Qwest DSL with fixed IP and have port 25 forwarded to the Barracuda on the DSL modem. Don't have the firewall enabled on the modem, just NAT.

Read some other articles, but no solutions.  Any ideas what to check next?
0
Comment
Question by:KZim
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
Sommerblink earned 500 total points
ID: 35014074
Well, technically it is an upstream issue.. its just not that far away upstream.

Things to look for are the number of sessions that your DSL/NAT/PAT device can handle. Whether your DSL/NAT/PAT device can handle concurrency to the same inbound port.

I would suggest purchasing a proper firewall verses relying on something free... especially since you've already taken several steps in the right direction towards spam elimination, the Barracuda... sorry, I am very partial towards that product line :)

Even something like the Cisco RV series would probly be a large step forward, without a large capital investment. (http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/solutions/small_business/products/routers_switches/small_business_routers/index.html)
0
 

Author Comment

by:KZim
ID: 35016104
Just to make sure I understand your suggestion, it's that the DSL model (an ActionTec M1000) potentially isn't robust enough to handle the incoming traffic appropriately.  So look to replace it with a more robust router (such as the Cisco), right?
0
 

Author Comment

by:KZim
ID: 35036414
In looking at the Cisco line, these aren't ADSL routers, so my Qwest DSL modem would stay in place, right?  How would that hellp the throughput.  Or, do I need to look at another product to replace the actiontec competely?
0

Featured Post

Threat Intelligence Starter Resources

Integrating threat intelligence can be challenging, and not all companies are ready. These resources can help you build awareness and prepare for defense.

Join & Write a Comment

Suggested Solutions

Even if you have implemented a Mobile Device Management solution company wide, it is a good idea to make sure you are taking into account all of the major risks to your electronic protected health information (ePHI).
Join Greg Farro and Ethan Banks from Packet Pushers (http://packetpushers.net/podcast/podcasts/pq-show-93-smart-network-monitoring-paessler-sponsored/) and Greg Ross from Paessler (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) for a discussion about smart network …
In this video we show how to create an Accepted Domain in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Mail Flow >> Ac…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

760 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

22 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now