Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of AshlingGarry
AshlingGarry

asked on

Exchange 2003 Outlook Mobile Access

Hi,

Is anyone aware of a third party tool that will allow us greater visibility while administering Outlook Mobile Access users with Exchange 2003?
We have the Microsoft Tool installed which allows us to complete a remote wipe and also see a transaction log of events that have occured. http://servername/mobileadmin See attached.
However we would like to be able to see from a glance what users are actively using ActiveSync.

The cutome LDAP query (&(&(objectClass=user)(homeMDB=*)(!(msExchOmaAdminWirelessEnable:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)))) will allow us to determine which users have the permissions applied to their account, however we need to be able to see which users are actually using it.
I realise that we could look through logs etc, and also that 2010/2007 allows greater granular visibility through powershell but need to be able to see this level of detail within Exchange 2003 SP2.

Any assistance much appreciated

Kind regards. ActiveSync.doc
Avatar of Amit
Amit
Flag of India image

Try Exmon tool.
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Microsoft-Exchange-Server-User-Monitor.html

This will show you the user accessing the server in real time
Most of the Activesync information are store in IIS logs. You can use logpraser or other IIS monitoring tool for checking the logs.

Avatar of AshlingGarry
AshlingGarry

ASKER

Thank you for your responses.

Exmon would have to be run on each backend Exchange server for a period of time for us to see this.
We want to be able to see this in a quick simple manner as and when necessary.
Parsing the IIS logs again is not an option for us - it would be too laborious.

Is anyone aware of a third party tool that could facilite this?

Kind regards.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Amit
Amit
Flag of India image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Thanks - we're going to use an LDAP query