• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 478
  • Last Modified:

Write a string manipulation algorithm for html source code


Say that I have a string object which holds the source code for an HTML page.

Within that, I want to remove its tables if there are some.

If I get the first <table and the last </table> I can remove all the section that includes the tables.

However, I need to remove just the strings of those tables and I do not want to use DOM or Sax due to their time cost.

The problem is very easy if I have the following situation:

<table>
  <tr>
     <th>One</th>
     <th>Two</th>
  </tr>
</table>
<table>
  <tr>
    <th>Three</th>
    <th>Four</th>
  </tr>
</table>

I have 2 tables in sequence, I can easily copy those substrings and put into a String list (List<String>)

Now, when the tables are in nested state, such as:

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>One</th>
    <th>Two</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
     <td>
       <table>
         <tr>
           <th>Three</th>
           <th>Four</th>
         </tr>
       </table>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>


Then, if I want to separate the 2 tables into a string list I would have, the parent table as it is as the first entry on the list:


<table>
  <tr>
    <th>One</th>
    <th>Two</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
     <td>
       <table>
         <tr>
           <th>Three</th>
           <th>Four</th>
         </tr>
       </table>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>


And then the second table on the second entry on the list:

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>Three</th>
    <th>Four</th>
  </tr>
</table>

Now, to determine that tables are nested, all I have to do is to verify that after the first <table, there no following </table> but another <table

I need to do this via string manipulation without involving any parsers like DOM or SAX. Any ideas how to make it easier?

Thanks.


0
CarlosScheidecker
Asked:
CarlosScheidecker
  • 6
  • 3
  • 2
1 Solution
 
for_yanCommented:
Well, if you don't want to use SAX, you can actually rather simply
 write your own portion of it - just read lines one by one and check if indexOf("<table>")
and indexOf("</table>") and incremnement level paramtere so that you know at which
level of table you are currently parsing. It will not be as general as SAX,
as some people may write say <  table> wit a space or spread it across two lines, but this is not probable.
0
 
mwochnickCommented:
consider using something like this http://htmlparser.sourceforge.net/ 
0
 
CarlosScheideckerAuthor Commented:
Mwochnick. I have tried that before and it is not efficient. It creates objects and that takes time. Like I have stated on my question, string manipulation is what I need because it is much faster.
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
for_yanCommented:
But SAX is rather efficient.  If you write your own string manipulations
they will certainly be less general and where is the guarantee that they
would be faster?

Are you dealing with really huge files?
0
 
CarlosScheideckerAuthor Commented:
for_yan. Not fast enough. I wrote a parser on SAX. I need that to be able to do it in tenths of a second, not within seconds.
0
 
CarlosScheideckerAuthor Commented:
for_yan, your first comment is what I will be exploring. That is what I need to do. So I will create a small project to do that and see how it goes.
0
 
mwochnickCommented:
I'd consider using ByteArrayInputStream and ByteArrayOutputStream and using arrays to be pointers to your <table> and </table> tags.  
0
 
for_yanCommented:
Yes, there is always a trade-off between speed and generality. Wish you success.
0
 
CarlosScheideckerAuthor Commented:
Mwochnick, that is what I am doing to parse XML. Pointers. As for the rest, I want to yank the tables out first.
0
 
CarlosScheideckerAuthor Commented:
I was able to do that even simpler than that. From my last post

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/Java/Q_26856859.html 

I have changed the code so that it would get the table tags instead.

HTMLElement[] tbls = resp.getElementsByTagName("table");

for (int i = 0; i < tbls.length; i++) {
                        aux = setXMLHeader(encoding);
                        aux += "<collections>";
                        aux += print(tbls.getNode());
                        aux += "</collections>";
                        strTables.add(aux);
                  }

And that is the answer to it.
0
 
CarlosScheideckerAuthor Commented:
This is the correct answer on an easier way
0

Featured Post

Keep up with what's happening at Experts Exchange!

Sign up to receive Decoded, a new monthly digest with product updates, feature release info, continuing education opportunities, and more.

  • 6
  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now