Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of enrique_aeo
enrique_aeo

asked on

oracle: better the perfomrnace. inner join vs partition by

I have 2 querys, the former takes more than 15 minutes.
query 1
select      
          ts1.CodUnico,
            ts1.RazonSocial,
            ...
            ts1.LineaCredTienda
from        tmp_Solicitud ts1 inner join tmp_Solicitud ts2
            on ts1.CODSOLICITUD = ts2.CODSOLICITUD
            and ts2.codsolicitud = (select max(t.codsolicitud)
                                    from tmp_Solicitud t  
                                    where ts2.CodUnico = t.CodUnico);  
                                   

query 2
SELECT
       codunico,
       razonsocial,
       numerodocumento,
       codtipobanca,
       codgrupo,
       codcalificacionsbs,
       codfeve,
       rating,
       codsegmentacion,
       codejecutivonegocios,
       desejecutivonegocios,
       lineacredtienda
  FROM (SELECT codunico,
               razonsocial,
               numerodocumento,
               CASE codtipobanca
                   WHEN 1 THEN 'Corporativa BC'
                   WHEN 2 THEN 'Empresa BE'
                   WHEN 3 THEN 'Institucional BI'
                   WHEN 4 THEN 'Leasing LS'
               END
                   codtipobanca,
               codgrupo,
               codcalificacionsbs,
               codfeve,
               rating,
               CASE codsegmentacion WHEN '1' THEN '1' ELSE '0' END codsegmentacion,
               codejecutivonegocios,
               desejecutivonegocios,
               lineacredtienda,
               RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY codunico ORDER BY codsolicitud DESC) r
          FROM tmp_solicitud)
 WHERE r = 1

Thanks to you, the query was modified and now takes less than 2 seconds, my question is why?
 Deputy respective execution plans.
 Greetings

partitionBY.jpg
INNERjoin.jpg
SOLUTION
Avatar of Sean Stuber
Sean Stuber

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of slightwv (䄆 Netminder)
slightwv (䄆 Netminder)

Since your question has to do with performance:  What version of Oracle are you using?

I noticed you are using Rule-Based Optimization.  If possible and you aren't using it 'by choice', I would look into using Cost-Based Optimization.

Check the online documentation for your version.

Here's the 11Gr2 link (It's what I have bookmarked):
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17120/ds_appdev004.htm#ADMIN12198
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
>>but it's not actually related to the specific reason why query 2 is better than query 1.

As they are currently written, I agree and should have commented on that.

enrique_aeo,
please do not award any points to my post on RBO versus CBO.