Solved

Another thread question

Posted on 2011-03-02
3
255 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
Lets say I have a class like this

public class MyThreadWorkerClass

public sub DoWork()
  '  do work
    Thread.CurrentThread.Abort()
end sub

end class


In this class I start the threads

public class ThreadStarter

public sub StartMyThreads()
        if threadcnt < maxThreadCnt then
            dim tWorker as new MyThreadWorkerClass
            dim t as new Thread(AddressOf MyThreadWorkerClass.DoWork)
             t.Start()
             threadcnt += 1
        end if
end sub

end class


My question is this.  When the thread aborts itself, does that kill the thread and tworker object (set them to nothing) or does this leave objects hanging, eventually leading to a memory leak?

How would you set the objects to nothing otherwise when the thread finishes?

0
Comment
Question by:rutledgj
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:Mike Tomlinson
ID: 35023732
It kills the thread...though instead of Abort() you could just use "Exit Sub" as the thread dies when the end of the method is reached.

If there are no other references to your MyThreadWorkerClass instances then they will be marked for garbage collection and eventually destroyed automatically.

Also, instead of:

    dim t as new Thread(AddressOf MyThreadWorkerClass.DoWork)

It would be:

    dim t as new Thread(AddressOf tWorker.DoWork)

*Though you probably already knew that and this is just example code.
0
 

Author Comment

by:rutledgj
ID: 35023749
So does the new t as Thread also get marked for GC? Are both objects marked for gc when the thread completes?
0
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
Mike Tomlinson earned 500 total points
ID: 35023794
Correct.

Since it is a local variable and goes out of scope after StartMyThreads() exits you will have no way of referencing it.  As such, it will be marked by the GC and disposed of.

If you had added "t" to some kind of list (keeping a reference somewhere) then you could query it with Thread.IsAlive or Thread.ThreadState to figure out if that particular thread was still running or had been aborted.
0

Featured Post

Salesforce Made Easy to Use

On-screen guidance at the moment of need enables you & your employees to focus on the core, you can now boost your adoption rates swiftly and simply with one easy tool.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Well, all of us have seen the multiple EXCEL.EXE's in task manager that won't die even if you call the .close, .dispose methods. Try this method to kill any excels in memory. You can copy the kill function to create a check function and replace the …
Since .Net 2.0, Visual Basic has made it easy to create a splash screen and set it via the "Splash Screen" drop down in the Project Properties.  A splash screen set in this manner is automatically created, displayed and closed by the framework itsel…
In this video, viewers will be given step by step instructions on adjusting mouse, pointer and cursor visibility in Microsoft Windows 10. The video seeks to educate those who are struggling with the new Windows 10 Graphical User Interface. Change Cu…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …

630 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question