• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 2336
  • Last Modified:

Short vs Long Wavelenght SFP Transceiver

Going from switch to switch is about 300 feet.  Is there any benefit to using a long wavelength SFP transceiver over a short wavelength?  I plan to use 1 port in the switch for up and down instead of dedicated 1 for up and 1 for down.

2 Solutions
for 300 feet short (sc) sfp is definitley the choice!
1 port is enough - correct !

Well, I agree that short wave is fine for a 300 ft. run.

However, as to one port, I personally don't see enough information to say yes or no.

What are the switches?

How many devices are on each end that need to talk to each other across this link?

Could they generate enough traffic to saturate the link?

Do you feel that 1 link will provide you the reliability that you need?  How much pain will you endure if this link goes down.
Craig BeckCommented:
If you want to do this use SX modules.

As for 1 up 1 down, use LACP between the two switches.
Tracso40Author Commented:
@ giltjr
The switches are a dell powerconnect 2724 and 2848.  I don't think traffic will be a problem.  It's mostly internet and documents.  As far as redundancy goes, we are using two pair of fiber but have 2 more pairs as backup...as well as a pair of cat6e in case the entire fiber strand gets cut (backup to the backup)

Thanks to all for the input.  It is greatly appreciated.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Hire Technology Freelancers with Gigs

Work with freelancers specializing in everything from database administration to programming, who have proven themselves as experts in their field. Hire the best, collaborate easily, pay securely, and get projects done right.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now