Solved

Why is this C++ class' int data member do not get initialized?

Posted on 2011-03-03
10
676 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I thought that the if default constructor does not exists, all POD's' get automatically initialized. But in this simple example the data value 'a' is not getting initialized.

#include "stdafx.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

class AClass
{
  int a;

 public:
   int getA() {return a;}
};

int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
      int aValue;
      AClass ac;

      cout << ac.getA() << endl;
      cin >> aValue;

      return 0;
}
0
Comment
Question by:prain
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • +2
10 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 35032505
That's a wrong assumption. You are responsible for initializing each and every member. What should the compiler initialize the values with anway? 0 or better 42?
0
 

Author Comment

by:prain
ID: 35032686
I do not expect a 42. That's a foolish statement. But at least I would like to see value 0 which can be considered as a default value.
0
 

Author Comment

by:prain
ID: 35032748
By the way, what is the default Constructor's job then in C++. I know what Java/C# default constructor doing. What's the use of the default constructor for C++ then if is is not initializing the class POD.
0
Netscaler Common Configuration How To guides

If you use NetScaler you will want to see these guides. The NetScaler How To Guides show administrators how to get NetScaler up and configured by providing instructions for common scenarios and some not so common ones.

 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 35032865
A default constructor is a constructor that can be called without supplying an argument.
A constructor creates an object  (i.e., defines a memory region for the object) and initializes (provided that you have initialization rules, of course).

If you want a default constructor that initializes the int a to 0, then add a default constructor. Below is one way to do this. It is a little more general than always forcing the 'a' to become 0, since it allows for an object to be constructed with a different initialization. But it is a default constructor since you can create your object without supplying any arguments to the constructor (in which case, 'a' is initialized to 0).
class AClass
{
  int a;

 public:
   AClass ( int x=0 ) : a(x) {}   // add constructor
   int getA() {return a;}
};

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:prain
ID: 35032892
I do not think a constructor would create memory regions. Memory region of the object should created prior to that because the constructor is also in the object's scope. So it cannot create a memory region for the object. But building the data components within the object is possible. JMO
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 35032920
Do you prefer this wording?

"When an object of a class is created, C++ calls the constructor for that class. If no constructor is defined, C++ invokes a default constructor, which allocates memory for the object, but doesn't initialize it."
     http://www.fredosaurus.com/notes-cpp/oop-condestructors/constructors.html
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 35032968
>> what is the default Constructor's job then in C++.
Here are other words that you may prefer:

"Default constructors are called implicitly to create class objects of static or automatic storage duration defined without an initializer, are called to create class objects of dynamic storage duration created by a new-expression in which the new-initializer is omitted, or are called when the explicit type conversion syntax is used."
0
 
LVL 53

Accepted Solution

by:
Infinity08 earned 125 total points
ID: 35034224
It seems that the crux of your question hasn't been addressed yet :

>> What's the use of the default constructor for C++ then if is is not initializing the class POD.

The thing to realize is that in C++, strict rules are followed for initialization (see paragraph 8.5 in the C++ standard).

One of those rules says that if no initializer is specified for a non-const non-static POD (plain old data) type (like int eg.), it will have an indeterminate value.

That is why if you do :

        int i;

i will have an indeterminate value.

Now, to link this to your question : the implicitly defined default constructor performs the same initializations as would be performed by a user-written default constructor with an empty initializer list.
Or in other words : an implicitly defined default constructor does not provide an initializer for a non-const non-static POD data member. So, such data members will have an indeterminate value after construction.


What's the use of the implicitly defined default constructor then ? It's really only useful in trivial cases, and most of the time you will want to provide your own constructors.
0
 
LVL 33

Expert Comment

by:sarabande
ID: 35034988
the implicitly defined default constructor is of good use if you don't use POD type members. in bigger projects with frameworks that is not unlikely and you can/should spare default constructor, copy constructor and assignment operator in those cases.

Sara
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 35038299
>>That's a foolish statement

I love to meet intelligent and open minded people, too. Now, was I right or not?
0

Featured Post

3 Use Cases for Connected Systems

Our Dev teams are like yours. They’re continually cranking out code for new features/bugs fixes, testing, deploying, testing some more, responding to production monitoring events and more. It’s complex. So, we thought you’d like to see what’s working for us.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
mixing C++ & C# in Vis Studio 2013 7 176
Writing a parser for java language 4 79
Header of docx file 17 103
Issues with C++ Class 19 92
IntroductionThis article is the second in a three part article series on the Visual Studio 2008 Debugger.  It provides tips in setting and using breakpoints. If not familiar with this debugger, you can find a basic introduction in the EE article loc…
Many modern programming languages support the concept of a property -- a class member that combines characteristics of both a data member and a method.  These are sometimes called "smart fields" because you can add logic that is applied automaticall…
The viewer will learn how to use the return statement in functions in C++. The video will also teach the user how to pass data to a function and have the function return data back for further processing.
The viewer will be introduced to the technique of using vectors in C++. The video will cover how to define a vector, store values in the vector and retrieve data from the values stored in the vector.

772 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question