• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 640
  • Last Modified:

SNAT exemption

Hi guys, I am using SNAT on a cisco router to accommodate HSRP redundancy.

My config is:

ip nat pool SNATp netmask
ip nat inside source route-map SNAT pool SNATp mapping-id 50 overload

On the standby HSRP router, I cannot communicate with the primary as the primary holds the .2 ip address, and due to the SNAT config, any traffic leaving the standby will also have the .2 address. How can I ensure that SNAT is exempt or ignored when .4 talks to .2 and .3 and .3 talks to .2 and .4

Hope that makes sense.
  • 2
1 Solution
Matt VCommented:
You should be able to do a deny in your route map for the IPs you do not want to SNAT.
Matt VCommented:
In your access list for the route-map match statement, put a deny statement first to deny the IPs you do NOT want SNATed.
xyznetworksAuthor Commented:
Yep this is what I did and it worked, thanks
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Your question, your audience. Choose who sees your identity—and your question—with question security.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now