• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 693
  • Last Modified:

Network design which Cisco router should be buy??

Currently I have a Cisco 2921 router at my data center running BGP with dual GigE Internet connections.  We are providing a hosted Voice over IP solution for about 2,000 IP phones.   The Cisco CPU runs at about 90% during peek hours of the day which is forcing us to upgrade.  We were thinking of upgrading to the Cisco 3945e but feel we might max this router out in another 12 to 18 months.  The CPU and packets per second are important to us since QoS needs to be maintained for voice quality.

We are looking for suggestions.

1 Solution
what services is the 2921 router handling, routing only? NAT, Voice gateway, VPN, etc?

Have a look at the table in

Based on your required bandwidth / packet rates you should be able to choose which range to go for
Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

7600 would be very good, though, if you don't wan't to go that far yet and you still want to get a fair amount of service time for your aquisition, a 7200 with an NSE100 should be good enough.  :)
ipconfig610Author Commented:
Our setup is pretty basic.  NAT, BGP, site to site VPN,   Currently we only have the 1 router which is a single point of failure on our network.  We cannot afford downtime so I need to build a redundant solution which of course fits within our budget.   We have 2 GigE fiber connections with 2 ISP's.  I would like to purchase 2 routers and peer each with an ISP and still run BGP.

Well, then maybe the 7600 it's the solution you are looking for.

From my point of view, the possible solutions would be:

1)  to buy 2x 3945 routers and have them load-sharing, in case of a link or hardware failure of any of 'em, just redirect the traffic to the remaining one.  (here you have to keep in mind the traffic load that the remaining router would have to take in case of failure of the other one)

2)  same, but with 7200 routers.  You won't have to worry about traffic load.

3) a 7600 router.  This is more a switch than a router, but you can add 2x Supervisor Engine modules and they will give you the redundancy you are looking for without the need of buying a 2nd appliance.  They also have the capability so that in case of failure of one Sup, the supporting one will sustain connectivity of the link in the downed Sup.  So you will allways have your 2 links active.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Your question, your audience. Choose who sees your identity—and your question—with question security.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now