Solved

Detect outliers in a series of numbers

Posted on 2011-03-04
6
1,704 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
Suppose I have a series of numbers like this

-0.0289436618082665
-0.0322635297824615
0.0473380547993016
-0.0483053616147235
0.0561386651052217
-0.0546202231192121
3912478746624.73
-0.0570958411471398
-0.0406567550991673
-0.0191101260081410
-0.0178598058749180
5912378756654.12
-0.00649518615382946
-0.0569007033673227
0.00634860933789683

So you most are within a certain range, say +/- 1.0, but there a couple numbers way out of this range.
Is there an algorithm to determine which numbers are these outliers?
I was thinking if I could detect these, then I could calculate the mean of the non-outliers and replace the outliers with that.
0
Comment
Question by:allelopath
6 Comments
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
deighton earned 84 total points
Comment Utility
yes you calculate the mean and standard deviation of the numbers.

then for each number you calculate the number of standard deviations from the mean

if the number is more than 4 standard deviations from the mean, it can be considred an outsider.

I see your out-lying values are extremely outside the range of the others.
0
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:TommySzalapski
TommySzalapski earned 167 total points
Comment Utility
if the number is more than 4 standard deviations from the mean, it can be considred an outsider.

This threshold for what makes it an outlier is really application dependent. In fact, for the data you posted, one of the obvious outliers is less than 3 standard deviations from the mean. Many applications would throw out the top and bottom 5-10% of the data before doing any caclulations. If you do that, then your outliers will be over a billion standard deviations from the mean and would be outliers by almost any standard.
0
 
LVL 27

Assisted Solution

by:aburr
aburr earned 83 total points
Comment Utility
All this outliers business is very fraught with danger.
Physics is full of stories about people ignoring outliers and missing Nobel prizes.
Nevertheless people find it useful to establish algorithms to spot outliers. There is no standard algorithm to which objections cannot be raised.
Several popular ones have been given above.
Obviously if you run your data through whatever algorithm you choose enough times you will end up with one data point. You should not discard any data point without a non-statistical cause. Nevertheless often the problem is not important enough to spend a lot of time on it so one of the algorithms mentioned above will be usually an improvement in the decision making process.
0
6 Surprising Benefits of Threat Intelligence

All sorts of threat intelligence is available on the web. Intelligence you can learn from, and use to anticipate and prepare for future attacks.

 
LVL 32

Assisted Solution

by:phoffric
phoffric earned 166 total points
Comment Utility
I just wanted to remind you that the mean and standard deviation includes the outliers and depending upon the quantity and magnitude of these outliers, these values could be adversely skewed. Depending on your model, the mean and standard deviation may be just what you need.

You may also want to consider determining the median instead. And if you can define from your model what an outlier is, then you might consider a % threshold error (or an absolute threshold error value - depends on your model), so that if the absolute value of the difference between the median and the data point exceeds the threshold, then that point will be considered an outlier.

As others have already alluded, you need to understand your model in order to define what an outlier is.
0
 
LVL 32

Assisted Solution

by:phoffric
phoffric earned 166 total points
Comment Utility
Here are some EE discussions on outliers. Again, make sure that the question in the OP fits your model before applying any points made:

     http://rdsrc.us/GyvkW7

     http://rdsrc.us/U4sDl9

     http://rdsrc.us/VrQc4e
     
0
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:TommySzalapski
TommySzalapski earned 167 total points
Comment Utility
Another common thing to do in outlier detection is to consider the mean and standard deviation (sd) of all points but the one in question. This tends to avoid the problem of one massive outlier messing up the statistics.
The best way to do that is to get the mean and sd for the whole set and 'remove' the one in question.
If you have N data points and want to remove x then you just do newmean = (mean*n-x)/(n-1) and that gives you the mean without considering x.
For the sd, remember that the mean of the x^2 minus the mean^2 gives the sd, so if you keep track of the mean of the squares, you can do the same thing for sd.
0

Featured Post

Enabling OSINT in Activity Based Intelligence

Activity based intelligence (ABI) requires access to all available sources of data. Recorded Future allows analysts to observe structured data on the open, deep, and dark web.

Join & Write a Comment

Suggested Solutions

Since upgrading to Office 2013 or higher installing the Smart Indenter addin will fail. This article will explain how to install it so it will work regardless of the Office version installed.
This is about my first experience with programming Arduino.
Viewers will learn how to properly install Eclipse with the necessary JDK, and will take a look at an introductory Java program. Download Eclipse installation zip file: Extract files from zip file: Download and install JDK 8: Open Eclipse and …
In this fifth video of the Xpdf series, we discuss and demonstrate the PDFdetach utility, which is able to list and, more importantly, extract attachments that are embedded in PDF files. It does this via a command line interface, making it suitable …

771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

10 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now