?
Solved

Can Lync Server 2010 Use an Existing SQL server?

Posted on 2011-03-04
3
Medium Priority
?
1,228 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-29
I am curious if Lync Server 2010 databases be hosted on a shared SQL server (or cluster)? i.e. SQL server is hosting other third party application databases or even OCS 2007 R2 databases? This TechNet article seems to indicate it is a supported scenario: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398102.aspx

I understand the best practice would be to provide Lync a named instance exclusively for its databases, but are there any performance guidelines or sizing considerations to account for when collocating the Lync SQL instance on a shared SQL server?
0
Comment
Question by:jhindson
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 59

Accepted Solution

by:
Cliff Galiher earned 1400 total points
ID: 35074766
Lync Server *ENTERPRISE* (not standard) can have its back-end databases hosted in an instance with multiple other databases, as long as you follow the other restrictions outlined (aka you can't have two monitoring databases in one instance, etc). You'll define the instance to use while using the topology builder, and then the topology builder tool will create the actual databases.

And yes, the SQL servers can be clustered.

More info:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg425848.aspx

-Cliff
0
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:Jian An Lim
Jian An Lim earned 600 total points
ID: 35074807
there is no simple answer.

especially you you are sharing it with other database that i have no idea what is.



What microsoft recommend is the hardware requirement for database server based
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398835.aspx




Is it better to have one large server running multiple databases, or several smaller servers running one database each?
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/faq/multiple_databases_servers_p1.aspx

0
 
LVL 59

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 35074840
To add to that, one larger server running multiple *instances* is still better than running multiple databases. The separation of memory, ability to individually tune for the application, etc makes this a near must. I'd never personally run completely different applications off the same instance as the tuning metrics will never align.

-Cliff
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The Delta outage: 650 cancelled flights, more than 1200 delayed flights, thousands of frustrated customers, tens of millions of dollars in damages – plus untold reputational damage to one of the world’s most trusted airlines. All due to a catastroph…
What if you have to shut down the entire Citrix infrastructure for hardware maintenance, software upgrades or "the unknown"? I developed this plan for "the unknown" and hope that it helps you as well. This article explains how to properly shut down …
Via a live example combined with referencing Books Online, show some of the information that can be extracted from the Catalog Views in SQL Server.
Via a live example, show how to setup several different housekeeping processes for a SQL Server.
Suggested Courses

771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question