virtual destuctor

I have seen following in my appln.

class A {

virtual ~A();
}

class B : public A {
  B()
}

Inside B.cpp, the function ~A() and ~B() both is missing

Shouldn't the base class destructor MUST be defined in child class
learningunixAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
jkrCommented:
Virtual destructors only guarantee for the calling order, nothing else - you don't necessarily have to provide an explicit destructor in a derived class, the compiler will create a default destructor that will then be chained in the sequence - see also http://www.codersource.net/c/c-miscellaneous/c-virtual-destructors.aspx
0
 
Deepu AbrahamR & D Engineering ManagerCommented:
Unlike ordinary member functions, a virtual destructor is not overridden when redefined in a derived class. Rather, it is extended: the lower-most destructor first invokes the destructor of its base class and only then, it is executed.

0
 
jkrCommented:
DeepuAbrahamK, it's always a good idea to quote your sources: http://www.codeguru.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-445242.html

STLDude
February 4th, 2008, 10:58 AM
A little more info:
Unlike ordinary member functions, a virtual destructor is not overridden when redefined in a derived class. Rather, it is extended: the lower-most destructor first invokes the destructor of its base class and only then, it is executed.
0
Cloud Class® Course: Amazon Web Services - Basic

Are you thinking about creating an Amazon Web Services account for your business? Not sure where to start? In this course you’ll get an overview of the history of AWS and take a tour of their user interface.

 
Deepu AbrahamR & D Engineering ManagerCommented:

class A
{
public:
      A()
      {
            cout<<"I am inside the ctor : A"<<endl;
      }

    virtual ~A()
      {
            cout<<"I am inside the dtor : A"<<endl;
      }
};

class B:public A
{
public:
      B()
      {
            cout<<"I am inside the ctor : B"<<endl;
      }

    virtual ~B()
      {
            cout<<"I am inside the dtor : B"<<endl;
      }
};


int main () {
  A* a = new B();
  delete a;
}
0
 
Deepu AbrahamR & D Engineering ManagerCommented:
I found that statement is very crisp:
pleasw refer : http://www.devx.com/tips/Tip/12729
0
 
learningunixAuthor Commented:
thx
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.