Solved

Supernetting an existing network

Posted on 2011-03-07
4
681 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
Hi,

I have a network 192.168.1.0 /25.  This network's use has ballooned and I only have 4 addresses left to give out.  I would like to change it to 192.168.1.0 /23 (to go from 126 addresses to 510).  Here are my steps :

1. Change the firewall interfaces for 192.168.1.0 to the new subnet (as the firewall also does the routing between networks).
2. Change the servers subnet masks from /25 to /23 as time permits (during this time all /25 hosts should be able to communicate without issue correct ?  They will have to change to /23 subnet inorder to communicate with new nodes in the new parts of this subnet correct ?).
3. I do not run any routing protocols like RIP or OSPF (everything is static), so no biggie there.

Am I oversimplifying things ?  Is there anything I am missing ?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:Elemental12
4 Comments
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:macoronat
macoronat earned 167 total points
Comment Utility
Everything sounds fine.  Just remember that you will need to keep the same default gateway address in order for the devices that are already working in your network, to keep on communicating with the outside and not just between devices within the same network.
0
 
LVL 35

Assisted Solution

by:Ernie Beek
Ernie Beek earned 166 total points
Comment Utility
Only keep in mind that when changing to the new subnet, the network will become 192.168.0.0/23 (and not 192.168.1.0/23 as you put it). So the range will be: 192.168.0.0-192.168.1.255
0
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
Jan Springer earned 167 total points
Comment Utility
The only problem that you might run into is if any of your equipment expects the subnet with mask to fall on a CIDR boundary, i.e., you might have to use 192.168.0.0/23.
0
 
LVL 29

Expert Comment

by:pwindell
Comment Utility
No everything is not fine.  Ethernet should not have subnets beyond 250-300 Hosts.  Rolling back the mask by just one bit jumps it to 510,...then next bit jumps to 1022.  Someone my argue that 350-400 won't hurt performance but 510 is too much.

For every 200 Hosts create a new subnet.  All it takes is the addition of a simple LAN Router.  If a company can afford to have a network larger than 200 machines then there is no way they can argue that they can not afford a simple LAN Router.
0

Featured Post

IT, Stop Being Called Into Every Meeting

Highfive is so simple that setting up every meeting room takes just minutes and every employee will be able to start or join a call from any room with ease. Never be called into a meeting just to get it started again. This is how video conferencing should work!

Join & Write a Comment

In the world of WAN, QoS is a pretty important topic for most, if not all, networks. Some WAN technologies have QoS mechanisms built in, but others, such as some L2 WAN's, don't have QoS control in the provider cloud.
If your business is like most, chances are you still need to maintain a fax infrastructure for your staff. It’s hard to believe that a communication technology that was thriving in the mid-80s could still be an essential part of your team’s modern I…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…

772 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

10 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now