Solved

Supernetting an existing network

Posted on 2011-03-07
4
692 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
Hi,

I have a network 192.168.1.0 /25.  This network's use has ballooned and I only have 4 addresses left to give out.  I would like to change it to 192.168.1.0 /23 (to go from 126 addresses to 510).  Here are my steps :

1. Change the firewall interfaces for 192.168.1.0 to the new subnet (as the firewall also does the routing between networks).
2. Change the servers subnet masks from /25 to /23 as time permits (during this time all /25 hosts should be able to communicate without issue correct ?  They will have to change to /23 subnet inorder to communicate with new nodes in the new parts of this subnet correct ?).
3. I do not run any routing protocols like RIP or OSPF (everything is static), so no biggie there.

Am I oversimplifying things ?  Is there anything I am missing ?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:Elemental12
4 Comments
 
LVL 3

Assisted Solution

by:macoronat
macoronat earned 167 total points
ID: 35057245
Everything sounds fine.  Just remember that you will need to keep the same default gateway address in order for the devices that are already working in your network, to keep on communicating with the outside and not just between devices within the same network.
0
 
LVL 35

Assisted Solution

by:Ernie Beek
Ernie Beek earned 166 total points
ID: 35057398
Only keep in mind that when changing to the new subnet, the network will become 192.168.0.0/23 (and not 192.168.1.0/23 as you put it). So the range will be: 192.168.0.0-192.168.1.255
0
 
LVL 28

Accepted Solution

by:
Jan Springer earned 167 total points
ID: 35057403
The only problem that you might run into is if any of your equipment expects the subnet with mask to fall on a CIDR boundary, i.e., you might have to use 192.168.0.0/23.
0
 
LVL 29

Expert Comment

by:pwindell
ID: 35062282
No everything is not fine.  Ethernet should not have subnets beyond 250-300 Hosts.  Rolling back the mask by just one bit jumps it to 510,...then next bit jumps to 1022.  Someone my argue that 350-400 won't hurt performance but 510 is too much.

For every 200 Hosts create a new subnet.  All it takes is the addition of a simple LAN Router.  If a company can afford to have a network larger than 200 machines then there is no way they can argue that they can not afford a simple LAN Router.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

ADCs have gained traction within the last decade, largely due to increased demand for legacy load balancing appliances to handle more advanced application delivery requirements and improve application performance.
When you try to share a printer , you may receive one of the following error messages. Error message when you use the Add Printer Wizard to share a printer: Windows could not share your printer. Operation could not be completed (Error 0x000006…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

910 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

24 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now