Solved

Exchange 2010 Storage Planning

Posted on 2011-03-08
7
624 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I am preparing to migrate from Exchange 2003 to 2010 with a current mailbox count of 300 and a 70GB DB.

My primary mailbox server will have 6 HD's:

OS - RAID1 (148GB 15krpm SAS)
DB - RAID1 (600GB 15krpm SAS)
Recovery/Logs - RAID1 (1TB 7.2krpm SAS)

There will be 4 DAG's to separate mailbox roles. There will be an active and passive DAG on the primary server on the DB LUN.

The Recover/Log's LUN will have all of the log files as well as space to load a Backup Exec Recovery LUN if necessary.

I will also have a secondary mailbox server in the same site that will have the same HD configuration. There will only be a passive DAG DB on that server.

Does anyone see a flaw in this design? My Sr. Sys Admin belives it is risky to not have a hotspare for the mailbox DB LUN's. He also wants to put the log files on a faster rpm disk (15krpm). I don't believe this is necessary. If we lose an HD in the DB LUN we'll be ok. Worse case scenario is that we lose 2 HD's and have to failover to the secondary server.

I also read that 2010 has changed a lot of things in the way the IOPS work for logging. There is less demand and they even say that we can store logs and DB on the same LUN. I doubt a 7.2krpm SAS HD will cause Exchange to be that much slower than 15krpm SAS HD's.

Is this a solid configuration with regards to storage on Exchange 2010 or am I not following "best practices" with what other admins are doing?

I think my sys admin is going too far with the need for a hotspare and requiring faster log LUNs.
0
Comment
Question by:cogentsystems
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Amit
ID: 35071859
0
 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Amit
ID: 35071869
0
 

Author Comment

by:cogentsystems
ID: 35071980
I've seen that link before but I'm looking for a few opinions on whether a hotspare is really even necessary for the DB LUN (RAID1). I'm trying to keep everything on a single server and only have 6 HD bays.

I've also read some MS articles that say 7.2krpm SAS is "above average" for logging, but will there be a noticeable difference with 15krpm, or is it not worth the extra money for such a small environment.
0
Free Webinar: AWS Backup & DR

Join our upcoming webinar with experts from AWS, CloudBerry Lab, and the Town of Edgartown IT to discuss best practices for simplifying online backup management and cutting costs.

 
LVL 43

Expert Comment

by:Amit
ID: 35072083
As we knows that IOPS is greatly decreased in Exchange 2010. Again hardware design will be based on below scenario, and you can decide what you want to achieve

1) Server Resilency
2) Disk Resilency
3) Site Resilency

Above 3 are required for best Exchange, fault tolerance design.

Question regarding Faster Disk, It is alway good to use faster disk for Exchange servers. Specially Mailbox, as live database is keep updated regularly. Server Performance are revolves around 3 major factors:

Faster CPU
More RAM
Faster Hardisk

Apart from above, you need to see the long term solution. Exchange servers are designed for atleast to run 3 years. If you see MS trends, every 3-4 year they have new Exchange release.

You must also estimate the mail growth trend and according to that you can buy the best hardware.

Now answer for your questions
1) Hotspare is required?
If you can afford downtime for swaping HDD. Then it is not required.

2) 7.2K RPM SAS. These are MS minimum recommendations. Fasters are alway better.

Hope this clears your doubt
0
 

Author Comment

by:cogentsystems
ID: 35072168
Thanks for your detailed response. Yes, we can afford the downtime to swap the HDD although they are hot-swap so technically we would could do this live.

Understood that faster is always better, but do you think it will be noticeable between the two speeds of the HD's? Just curious.
0
 
LVL 43

Accepted Solution

by:
Amit earned 250 total points
ID: 35072318
As you have already choose RAID 1 logs. Which is recommend. Below MS link give more understanding

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832792.aspx

In this case I/O performance will be Average. With 15K it will be excellent. You will see the performance issue while writing to disk.

Hope, it clears all your doubts
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:cogentsystems
ID: 35072384
Thanks for you very quick responses. It was helpful.
0

Featured Post

Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Follow this checklist to learn more about the 15 things you should never include in an email signature from personal quotes, animated gifs and out-of-date marketing content.
How to resolve IMCEAEX NDRs in Exchange or Exchange Online related to invalid X500 addresses.
In this video we show how to create a Contact in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Recipients >> Contact ta…
In this video we show how to create a mailbox database in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Servers >> Data…

735 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question