?
Solved

Creation of global class in a DLL

Posted on 2011-03-11
6
Medium Priority
?
407 Views
Last Modified: 2012-08-13
Hi,

I am building is a series of .lib files that come together to form a single DLL. I also have a class called TestObject that manages some data.

Objectives:
1. A single TestObject instance must be globally accessible by all functions in the DLL libs.
2. DllMain should do some init + cleanup of the global TestObject.

The immediate problem is that I can't get past the linker:

error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall TestObject::~TestObject(void)" (??1TestObject@@QAE@XZ) referenced in function "void __cdecl `dynamic atexit destructor for 'testObj''(void)" (??__FtestObj@@YAXXZ)      mylib.lib
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: __thiscall TestObject::TestObject(void)" (??0TestObject@@QAE@XZ) referenced in function "void __cdecl `dynamic initializer for 'testObj''(void)" (??__EtestObj@@YAXXZ)      mylib.lib
error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: void __thiscall TestObject::PublicFunc(void)" (?PublicFunc@TestObject@@QAEXXZ) referenced in function _DllMain@12      mylib.lib

See code below. Should the TestObject reside elsewhere to be global? How can I get past the linker and have TestObject be fully global?

Thanks,
- Vashren
#include "TestObject.h"

TestObject g_testObj;

//----------------------------------------------------
// DllMain()
//----------------------------------------------------
BOOL APIENTRY DllMain(HINSTANCE hModule, DWORD dwReason, VOID* pReserved)
{
    g_testObj.PublicFunc();

    switch (dwReason)
    {
        case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:
            // some init of testObj
            break;
        case DLL_PROCESS_DETACH:
            // some cleanup of testObj
            break;
        default:
            break;
    }

    return TRUE;
}

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:Vashren
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 35110214
Well, it just seems that you have not provided both a constructor and a destructor for your class - are you linking with 'TestObject.cpp'?
0
 

Author Comment

by:Vashren
ID: 35110315
TestObject.cpp contains an implementation of the constructor & destructor.

However, I'm not well versed with the linker. Do you mean to say I need to do something with the CPP file?
0
 
LVL 86

Accepted Solution

by:
jkr earned 2000 total points
ID: 35110358
You need to add that file to your project, otherwise it won't be compiled or linked wirth and cause the errors you mentioned in your question. Right-click pn your projext, choose 'Add|Existing Item' and add 'TestObject.cpp'. "'Project|Add existing Item' (CTRL+SHIFT+A) will do the same.
0
Get real performance insights from real users

Key features:
- Total Pages Views and Load times
- Top Pages Viewed and Load Times
- Real Time Site Page Build Performance
- Users’ Browser and Platform Performance
- Geographic User Breakdown
- And more

 

Author Comment

by:Vashren
ID: 35110455
Awesome - it builds correctly now.

With the linker out of the way, I'll now see of the "globalness" works.
0
 
LVL 86

Assisted Solution

by:jkr
jkr earned 2000 total points
ID: 35110923
Should work fine ;o)

BTW, you might be interested in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_pattern - this takes the whole concept of 'global objects' to a new pattern. See also http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/singleton_template.aspx ("A Singleton Template Class") for an example.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Vashren
ID: 35112284
Thanks. Time to gobble up some points!
0

Featured Post

[Webinar] Lessons on Recovering from Petya

Skyport is working hard to help customers recover from recent attacks, like the Petya worm. This work has brought to light some important lessons. New malware attacks like this can take down your entire environment. Learn from others mistakes on how to prevent Petya like worms.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If you’re thinking to yourself “That description sounds a lot like two people doing the work that one could accomplish,” you’re not alone.
What do responsible coders do? They don't take detrimental shortcuts. They do take reasonable security precautions, create important automation, implement sufficient logging, fix things they break, and care about users.
This is Part 3 in a 3-part series on Experts Exchange to discuss error handling in VBA code written for Excel. Part 1 of this series discussed basic error handling code using VBA. http://www.experts-exchange.com/videos/1478/Excel-Error-Handlin…
Introduction to Processes

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question