Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

NAT question

Posted on 2011-03-12
6
Medium Priority
?
309 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
dear I have public ip x.x.x.x/21 with IP private 10.10.0.0/16(i have at least 10000 user be online at same time ) i want make NAT (PAT) , which router can handle for this thing ! ASR 1004 good !! please I want ur recommendation
0
Comment
Question by:memo12345678
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
remixedcat earned 2000 total points
ID: 35115514
what kind of connectivity do you have? and if you just got a regular cable/dsl connection you can have a netgear router and a switch.

If you have T1+ You can get a cisco enterprise router and managed switch. I suggest those.
0
 

Author Comment

by:memo12345678
ID: 35115555
I have Ethernet cable RJ45  1Gb , I'm providing internet for customer's , so tell me which kind of cisco enterprise router  recommend can handle NAT(pat) 10000 users go through IP public pool x.x.x.x/248 without router be overload his CPU !!!
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:remixedcat
ID: 35115560
I suggest looking at cisco's site for that and it would depend on your budget. I believe they have a tool to check that kind of thing.
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 

Author Comment

by:memo12345678
ID: 35115561
I have Ethernet cable RJ45  1Gb , I'm providing internet for customer's , so tell me which kind of cisco enterprise router  recommend can handle NAT(pat) 10000 users go through IP public pool x.x.x.x/255.255.248.0 without router be overload his CPU !!!
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:kdearing
ID: 35115761
Either the ASR1002 or 1004 would be my recommendation.

In your case, the biggest difference is tha the 1004 supports multiple route processors.

Much of this depends on your budget, scalability requirements, interface requirements, etc.

As purely a WAN edge device I would go with the 1002
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:memo12345678
ID: 35238883
thx alot for thjis
0

Featured Post

VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

We've been using the Cisco/Linksys RV042 for years as: - an internet Gateway - a site-to-site VPN device - a leased line site-to-site subnet-to-subnet interface (And, here I'm assuming that any RV0xx behaves the same way as an RV042.  So that's …
In the world of WAN, QoS is a pretty important topic for most, if not all, networks. Some WAN technologies have QoS mechanisms built in, but others, such as some L2 WAN's, don't have QoS control in the provider cloud.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Suggested Courses

610 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question