Solved

EIGRP Feasible successor

Posted on 2011-03-16
8
1,107 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I am having hard time why/how is the feasible successor in EIGRP routing protocol has lesser disatnce than current successor... should it not be greater distance than cuurent successor???
Pl explain.
0
Comment
Question by:totaram
  • 4
  • 4
8 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:602650528
ID: 35155254
Hi totaram,

a feasible successor would NOT have a lesser distance than a successor. A feasible successor is able to take over from a successor as long as it is able to meet the feasibility condition.

Please have a look at this page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_Interior_Gateway_Routing_Protocol#Successor
0
 

Author Comment

by:totaram
ID: 35157542
Please see the following cisco pg, and read right above fig-3 and explaination of it paragraph below
the the two bullets

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_white_paper09186a0080094cb7.shtml#feasibleandreported
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:602650528
ID: 35158452
hi totaram, what you are mixing up is the terminology. First of all the feasible distance has no direct relationship to the feasible successor. The fact that feasible appear in both names does not mean they are directly related.
The feasible distance is the distance from Router one to network A. If the route is through, router three, the feasible distance is 46277376. That is distance from Router One to Network A. Also feasible distance from Router One to network A, through Router three, is 20307200. Because the distance through Router three is less, Router three becomes the successor. Note that Router three is successor because the distance of the route  from Router three to network A so it is because Router three is there.

Now for any router on any route between Router One and Network A to become a feasile successor, it's advertised distance (called reported distance) to network A must be less than the feasible distance. I guess that is where the confusion came in. This rule is there to avoid routing lop. If e.g Router 4 is so far from Router A , then it is most likely that it's route would pass through Router One hence a loop would be formed. In reality it might be the case but that rule is there to stop loops.


 The reported distance in that literature is actually more known as the advertised distance which is the distance
0
 

Author Comment

by:totaram
ID: 35159858
"Now for any router on any route between Router One and Network A to become a feasile successor, it's advertised distance (called reported distance) to network A must be less than the feasible distance. I guess that is where the confusion came in. This rule is there to avoid routing lop. If e.g Router 4 is so far from Router A , then it is most likely that it's route would pass through Router One hence a loop would be formed. In reality it might be the case but that rule is there to stop loops."

Yes, thats where my confusion lies.. the routing loops will happen happen if router 3 is passing traffic, but it is not passing traffic since its  a faesible successor. Also, if advt distance (reported disatnce) is less than current best path, that router given should become the successor and the second best should be the feasible successor.  The lines that throws me off is:
A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance (current best path).
0
IT, Stop Being Called Into Every Meeting

Highfive is so simple that setting up every meeting room takes just minutes and every employee will be able to start or join a call from any room with ease. Never be called into a meeting just to get it started again. This is how video conferencing should work!

 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:602650528
ID: 35163157
"Also, if advt distance (reported disatnce) is less than current best path, that router given should become the successor and the second best should be the feasible successor. "

No, successor is chosen based on feasible distance while feasible successor is chosen based on advertised distance. For example, even though the distance between Router Four  and network is shorter (it's same on this case really), what matters to Router One is the overall distance from Router One to network A and the over all distance through Router Three is shorter hence it is the successor and the reason being that the distance between Router One and Three is shorter that between Router One and Four.


 The lines that throws me off is:
A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance (current best path). "

Once again you need to distinguish what parameters is used to determine feasible successor and successor. They are two different parameters you can't place side by side. Successor is chosen using over all distance between Router One and Network A while feasible successor is chosen using advertised distance and that is distance between Router Three/Four to Network A.
0
 

Author Comment

by:totaram
ID: 35167139
Very good... Understood your point Thanks a lot..
I just have a minor question, say if there was a III path to network A, with router five and The route through Router Five has a cost of 4000000 and a reported distance of 307200. Which router will be the feasible successor?? How do we break the tie? Is it lower cost??

0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
602650528 earned 50 total points
ID: 35168303
A router can have as many feasible successors as long as they fulfil the feasibility condition that their advertised distance is lower than the feasible distance of the successor. Feasible Successor means they are eligible to become a successor if the current successor becomes unavailable. If the current successor becomes unavailable, then Router A will choose the route with the lowest distance (not advertised distance but full distance from Router One to NetworkA), in this case Router Five, among the feasible successors.

If you run the command .. show ip eigrp topology. It would show you the number of successors and feasible successors.

As well you can have more than one successor and that means there are more than one path with equal distance from Route One to Network A. Eigrp and other IGPs would automatically load balance over 4 equal routes so you can have up to 4 successors by default.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:totaram
ID: 35177425
Thank you
0

Featured Post

Better Security Awareness With Threat Intelligence

See how one of the leading financial services organizations uses Recorded Future as part of a holistic threat intelligence program to promote security awareness and proactively and efficiently identify threats.

Join & Write a Comment

Quality of Service (QoS) options are nearly endless when it comes to networks today. This article is merely one example of how it can be handled in a hub-n-spoke design using a 3-tier configuration.
Join Greg Farro and Ethan Banks from Packet Pushers (http://packetpushers.net/podcast/podcasts/pq-show-93-smart-network-monitoring-paessler-sponsored/) and Greg Ross from Paessler (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) for a discussion about smart network …
Viewers will learn how to connect to a wireless network using the network security key. They will also learn how to access the IP address and DNS server for connections that must be done manually. After setting up a router, find the network security…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

11 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now