This month’s featured course covers 16 hours of training in installation, management, and deployment of VMware vSphere virtualization environments. It's free for Premium Members, Team Accounts, and Qualified Experts!

Solved

Posted on 2011-03-20

Hi, I'm writing a stock analysis program and in it, I want to show if 2 stocks are related (ie. how much they move in synch). I'm already calculating the Correlation Coefficient between the 2 stocks and that seems to give a good realistic figure, and now I'm tackling Rsquared. I'm starting to wonder now if I even need to bother with Rsquared if I've already done the Correlation Coefficient. Isn't Rsquared just the Correlation Coefficient times itself? (if so, that info wouldn't be of much help). I'm using this formula to calculate Rsquared (as found doing a websearch):

Rsquared := Square (Covariance(Stock1,Stock2) / (StdDev(Stock1) * StdDev(Stock2)));

... but that formula does not yield the same value as the square of the Correlation Coefficient at all. Confused about that.

Furthermore, in my googling, it seems to say that Rsquared is an indication of how good a LINEAR REGRESSION line "fits" the data. But in my program, I'm not really comparing one stock to a linear regression line, I'm comparing one stock to another stock, so I don't really seem how Rsquared would apply in this case. Anyway, as you can probably tell, I'm not a stats whiz and I'm a little confused... maybe I just don't need to be bothering with Rsquared at all,eh? Doesn't seem like it's gonna tell me anything more than Correlation Coefficient.

Thanks

Shawn

Rsquared := Square (Covariance(Stock1,Stock2)

... but that formula does not yield the same value as the square of the Correlation Coefficient at all. Confused about that.

Furthermore, in my googling, it seems to say that Rsquared is an indication of how good a LINEAR REGRESSION line "fits" the data. But in my program, I'm not really comparing one stock to a linear regression line, I'm comparing one stock to another stock, so I don't really seem how Rsquared would apply in this case. Anyway, as you can probably tell, I'm not a stats whiz and I'm a little confused... maybe I just don't need to be bothering with Rsquared at all,eh? Doesn't seem like it's gonna tell me anything more than Correlation Coefficient.

Thanks

Shawn

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

- Help others & share knowledge
- Earn cash & points
- Learn & ask questions

2 Comments

Yes, R square should be the square of the correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient is often called R so R square is R^2.

The reason they aren't matching could be due to a few reasons.

1. You've miscalculated something

2. People use different definitions of the standard deviation. Often the "sample" standard deviation uses /(n-1) instead of /n to inflate the deviation slightly to adjust for the fact that you only have a sample. So if your calculations use different standard deviation methods, they won't match.

3. If R^2 is being defined as 1 - SSE/SST, then it might not match.

In short, they do measure the same thing. So you really could just pick one. If you want to go deeper in to it, you can post a sample and the two values your getting, and I'll help you sort out why. If you are fine just knowing that someone with a Math degree says you're right and you can use the correlation coeffitient to get R^2, then that's good too.

Cheers

Shawn

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Course of the Month8 days, 7 hours left to enroll

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.