Solved

Content database attach and detach - does it leave residue in the farm?

Posted on 2011-03-24
4
529 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
We have a SharePoint 2010 farm in the implementation stage.  We attached a SharePoint 2007 content database so we can see how it would upgrade.  We plan to detach the content database since this is just a test.  My colleague would like to roll the databases and server back to the time before the attach was done because of concerns that residue from the attach may be polluting the farm.  What do you think?  Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:OCSDTech
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:ImaCircularSaw
ID: 35208612
Seems like overkill.  How do you plan to rollback your server?

Technically (as long as the method for rolling back is sound) there should be no problems with this, howeever, any changes are stored in the content database and not in binaries on the fielsystem itself.

If this is your production server I understand but I think perhaps a little bit paranoid?  Is this a production or dev server/farm?
0
 

Author Comment

by:OCSDTech
ID: 35241687
The server is preproduction and I think that's why my colleague is concerned.  We'll be rolling back the databases and the virtual machine back to the same date time so they should match.  

The concern regarding the attach and detach of the content databases is that there are services that are shared such as search, profiles, bdc, managed metadata, etc. that may be polluted by the action of attaching the content database.  I'm assuming that those services will clean themselves of references to content in the detached databases and I would like to confirm this.  Thanks!
0
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
ImaCircularSaw earned 500 total points
ID: 35243462
Although the services are shared I think you'll find the db contents is separate. Also, search indexes can be trashed and rebuilt without causing problems with content.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:OCSDTech
ID: 35243485
Thanks for your help.
0

Featured Post

Simplifying Server Workload Migrations

This use case outlines the migration challenges that organizations face and how the Acronis AnyData Engine supports physical-to-physical (P2P), physical-to-virtual (P2V), virtual to physical (V2P), and cross-virtual (V2V) migration scenarios to address these challenges.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

MS Access 2003 or later To MySQL Migration Project Hello All, this is my second article in the category of MS-OFFICE Automation. In internet I am not able to find any comprehensive resource on the Migration of MS Access back-end to MySQL so I fin…
This very simple solution applies to a narrow cross-section of the "needs to close" variety. In this case, the full message in Event Viewer was in applog, Event ID 1000: Faulting application iexplore.exe, version 8.0.6001.18702, faulting module …
The viewer will learn how to simulate a series of sales calls dependent on a single skill level and learn how to simulate a series of sales calls dependent on two skill levels. Simulating Independent Sales Calls: Enter .75 into cell C2 – “skill leve…
The viewer will learn how to use the =DISCRINV command to create a discrete random variable, use this command to model a set of probabilities and outcomes in a Monte Carlo simulation, and learn how to find the standard deviation of a set of probabil…

776 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question