2 2-way tree-root transitive trusts

I am building 3 different forest on the same LAN. I am not going to build a forest and have parent and child trusts. NO.

Say I have forests A, B and C. Forest A/B are have a 2-way tree-root transitive trust and forests B/C also have a 2-way tree-root transitive trust.

Are users in Forest A able to access resource in forest C and vice versa? (considering the right security is provided)
Teddy_HowardAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
Darius GhassemConnect With a Mentor Commented:
No, you must have direct trust setup for all forests. A and C can not contact each other unless they have a transitive trusts setup directly between the two.
0
 
binary_1001010Commented:
no.

Cross Forest Trusts are NOT transitive. Parent/Child Doman/tree trusts are.

you might want to go through this article.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc773178%28WS.10%29.aspx
0
 
Teddy_HowardAuthor Commented:
Will i create any security or data flow concerns/issues if i trusted A/B, A/C and B/C, all 2-way tree-root transitive trusts?
0
Worried about phishing attacks?

90% of attacks start with a phish. It’s critical that IT admins and MSSPs have the right security in place to protect their end users from these phishing attacks. Check out our latest feature brief for tips and tricks to keep your employees off a hackers line!

 
binary_1001010Connect With a Mentor Commented:
cc773178.f152cae1-bf01-4377-9d57.gif

In this example, a two-way transitive forest trust exists between the forest root domains in Forest 1 and Forest 2, and another two-way transitive forest trust exists between the forest root domains in Forest 3 and Forest 2. This configuration allows:

    * Users in Forest 2 to access resources in any domain in either Forest 1 or Forest 3

    * Users in Forest 3 to access resources in any domain in Forest 2

    * Users in Forest 1 to access resources in any domain in Forest 2

This configuration does not allow users in Forest 1 to access resources in Forest 3 or vice versa. To allow users in both Forest 1 and Forest 3 to share resources, a two-way transitive trust must be created between the two forests.
0
 
Leon FesterSenior Solutions ArchitectCommented:
Everybody else above has answered your questions, but I'm curious...
Why 3 separate forests?
You'll only be increasing the amount of administration, especially considering you want to link them via trusts and have them running on the same LAN.
0
 
Teddy_HowardAuthor Commented:
For competition and government regulations.

thanks for your concern, DVT
0
 
Teddy_HowardAuthor Commented:
Thanks guys.
0
 
Leon FesterSenior Solutions ArchitectCommented:
I've worked on one of those setups before, they had a requirement that every forest is separated by firewalls as well.

I think I got most of my grey hairs on that project Good Luck!
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.