Cisco Access Layer redundancy

I am looking for some recommendation / design advise on establishing redundancy for 2 new switches in the access layer.
I currently have two 6509e switches in the core/dist layer.
These two switches are connected via a port channel trunk

I now have 2 new  6509e switches that are going to be used as the access layer for all the user workstations.
I am looking to breakup the user environment over several different vlans.
What are some ways or what is the best way to accomplish redundancy in the case of failure to one of the Core/dist switches?
I will obviously connect to both of the core/dist from each access switch but wondering if I should consider Layer3 LAG to the core via portchannel.  Will this eliminate having to use Spanning tree for failover if I go with Layer 2 trunks to the core/dist?

I appreciate any advise/insight into a good solution.
FREDARCEAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

John MeggersNetwork ArchitectCommented:
Depending on the size of the network, spanning tree can have problems, but if you're only taking about four switches, I wouldn't expect that to be a problem.  Most times when I work with customers who are doing L3 up to the core, it's because they have so many VLANs and so many switches that it's better to keep it limited to the access layer.  But in your network, I would probably just trunk to the core.  There's no "one way" to do it, and there's a lot of good information in Cisco's design guides.  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Campus/HA_campus_DG/hacampusdg.html#wp1107057

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
surbabu140977Commented:
HSRP should do for the failover.

The client PC's should have their default gateway set at the HSRP Ip address rather than the actual switch/vlan IP.


surbabu140977Commented:
The access layer switches also in turn should be pointing to the HSRP Ip's of the 2 existing core switches you are having.

Best,
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Network Architecture

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.