[Last Call] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
?
Solved

Stub Mailbox question

Posted on 2011-04-20
2
Medium Priority
?
621 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
During a mailbox move of about 130 people one standalone server to a cluster, about half of the mailboxes (70 give or take) were left behind on the source mailbox server, presumably because of a corrupted item or mailbox. We thought all mailboxes had been moved initially because the dialog box said successful. Further inspection revealed that many of the mailboxes still existed on the source server.

Over the course of this mailbox migration project, we have had several instances where a mailbox is moved, but a small mailbox with several items is left behind (a stub mailbox). By lowering the mailbox retention period and running the cleanup agent, we have been able to get rid of those stub mailboxes.

In this case, we have several stub mailboxes on the destination server, with a portion of the mailbox sitting on the source serve, and don’t know why. In some cases, we have several hundred MB or even a GB on the destination (stub) mailbox. Could it be that something interrupted mailboxes being moved and some of the content exists on the destination server as well as the source server?

We are a little nervous about lowering the retention period and running the cleanup (which is the typical fix action for stub mailboxes) on the destination mailbox server. This problem is the diametric opposite of what we are used to seeing.

The environment is a Windows server 2003 running Microsoft Exchange server Build 6.5.7638.1 on both the source standalone server and the destination cluster server.

I had set the point assignment at 125, as I am not too familiar at gauging point values on here.
0
Comment
Question by:ofdasupport
2 Comments
 
LVL 13

Accepted Solution

by:
seb_acker earned 500 total points
ID: 35438913
you can run the cleaning process without worrying. only one active mailbox can exist at a time, and sometimes some elements stays behind on the source, or on the target when the move is stopped. Not a big deal. Do as you always do.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ofdasupport
ID: 35439396
So even if we see substantial content, it will be relocated to the proper place, regardless of whether that is moving forward or backward?

Thanks
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Are you looking for the options available for exporting EDB files to PST? You may be confused as they are different in different Exchange versions. Here, I will discuss some options available.
Mailbox Corruption is a nightmare every Exchange DBA wishes he never has. Recovering from it can be super-hectic if not entirely futile. And though techniques like the New-MailboxRepairRequest cmdlet have been designed to help with fixing minor corr…
To show how to generate a certificate request in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.:  First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Servers >> Certificates…
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month18 days, 13 hours left to enroll

834 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question