?
Solved

Server 2000 issues on 2008 R2 domain

Posted on 2011-04-27
4
Medium Priority
?
275 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
Hi All.

I have recently just upgraded our 2003 domain to 2008 R2.  Everything was fine before hand.

However, after the upgrade, I have a single 2000 member server which is being difficult.  This is what is happening:
1) Connections to the shares on the Server 2000 via IP address are slow, and timeout when scripts are used, and occasionally machines will not connect to the share.
2) Connections to the same shares via DNS work perfectly
3) Non-Domain machines are unable to connect to the shares at all.

Everything was fine before I did the upgrade, and extremely puzzled as to why this would have changed.  Any help will be appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:AAComputerroom
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:Awinish
ID: 35499445
Windows 2000 lifetime period is over & even if you take up the issue with Microsoft, they will not be helping you as there might be issue but there is no more patches released & from security risk, you server can pose a threat to your environment due to missing patches in win2000.

I would suggest update the NIC card & server with latest firmware & driver might help you to resolve issues.
0
 
LVL 8

Expert Comment

by:steinmto
ID: 35507552
I have seen an issue like this before I think on your servers you need to have qos installed not sure why this is.  I have fixed an issue with 2003 servers and 2008 servers doing this.
0
 

Author Comment

by:AAComputerroom
ID: 35719052
Hi Guys, sorry for the delay getting back, and thank you for your feed back.

I have been able to isolate the problem causing the above, and it is the firewall.

The RPC is trying to communicate accross our subnets, and is being blocked by our firewall.  The RPC is trying to communicate between ports 49152 - 65535.  I understand that this port ranges have been reduced from 1024 - 65535.

I can see from our firewall that port 1025 was open previously, but this does not seem to be sufficient from my understanding of the process.

Would anyone be able to recommend a best practice in reducing these ports down to allow through the firewall, and possibly know why this would have changed?

Thank you
0
 
LVL 24

Accepted Solution

by:
Awinish earned 2000 total points
ID: 35719060
0

Featured Post

Get your Conversational Ransomware Defense e‑book

This e-book gives you an insight into the ransomware threat and reviews the fundamentals of top-notch ransomware preparedness and recovery. To help you protect yourself and your organization. The initial infection may be inevitable, so the best protection is to be fully prepared.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Group policies can be applied selectively to specific devices with the help of groups. Utilising this, it is possible to phase-in group policies, over a period of time, by randomly adding non-members user or computers at a set interval, to a group f…
How to deal with a specific error when using the Enable-RemoteMailbox cmdlet to create a mailbox in the cloud-based service, for an existing user in an on-premises Active Directory.
This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application to properly change the service account username and\or password in situation where it may be necessary or where the password has been inadvertently change…
This tutorial will show how to configure a single USB drive with a separate folder for each day of the week. This will allow each of the backups to be kept separate preventing the previous day’s backup from being overwritten. The USB drive must be s…
Suggested Courses

864 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question