We help IT Professionals succeed at work.

Need 5TB of dependable redundant storage for 200 users

Lotus30306
Lotus30306 asked
on
Medium Priority
550 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I have 200 users all at one site.  No big file thrashing, just excel and word files.  I need around 5TB of redundant storage.  Preferably SATA drives.  I also would like redundant power and gigbit ethernet.  Can a few people send over some links as suggestions?   Cheap and reliable is the key.   I have a nice backup solution in place which can back it up nightly I just want RAID5 so I can swap out bad drives as needed.  Thanks!
Comment
Watch Question

Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
CERTIFIED EXPERT

Commented:
I have worked with HP SANS which were very good as well. They many different configurable models so you can tailor them to your specific needs. At my current company we are running an EMC fibre channel SAN which is pretty amazing but also pretty expensive. If your not looking to break the bank id reccomend something more along the lines of the Dell/HP

Author

Commented:
I checked and these solutions are too expensive.  I am looking for something in between what you are suggesting but above something like a Netgear ReadyNAS (less than $3k for networked storage but with better speed and redundant power)  
CERTIFIED EXPERT

Commented:
DavidPresident
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Top Expert 2010
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
andyaldersaggar maker's framemaker
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Distinguished Expert 2019
Commented:
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
Unlock this solution and get a sample of our free trial.
(No credit card required)
UNLOCK SOLUTION
andyaldersaggar maker's framemaker
CERTIFIED EXPERT
Distinguished Expert 2019

Commented:
LOL, the answer you've accepted isn't valid, an iSCSI SAN is of no use at all unless you attach it to a server, and even then it's more expensive than direct attaching to a server.
Unlock the solution to this question.
Thanks for using Experts Exchange.

Please provide your email to receive a sample view!

*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

OR

Please enter a first name

Please enter a last name

8+ characters (letters, numbers, and a symbol)

By clicking, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.