Suppose you have a DAG that comprises two mailbox server. One server hosts the active copy of a DB and the other hosts the passive copy.
If the active copy of the DB becomes corrupt for whatever reason be it corrupt log files or general DB corruption (and not due to a problem with the underlying hardware) would Exchange detect the corruption in the active copy first and make sure it didn't happen to the passive copy?
Having said that I suppose the whole point in having a DAG is the seamless switchover in event of a db failure so the passive copy does need to always be as up to date as the active copy.
Does that even make sense?!!
Thanks in advance