2008 R2 NLB cluster hosting IIS: SAN configuration?

Posted on 2011-05-06
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
Hello all.

I am working on building a NLB cluster to load balance a few fairly busy websites. Both 2008 R2 boxes are connected via FiberChannel to an EMC AX4 SAN. They share the same logical drive to the SAN (E:) where all of the data for the sites is maintained. We are using the EMC proprietary software PowerPath to allow for both servers to access the same physical drive simultaneously.

The code for the websites is housed on C: which is replicated to each node via DFS if it matters.

The sites themselves do not write to common data. The only data that is written is session based so there shouldnt be any issues with the servers tripping over each other trying to write to the same file.

My question is this: what is the best way to set up the SAN so that both servers can access the necessary data? Is it as simple as connecting both servers to the same logical drive on the SAN where the data is housed? Since the SAN is comparatively small and has a single LUN, DFS replication of the data seems like it would be inefficient.

Your thoughts are appreciated.
Question by:MarlinTechSupport
    LVL 55

    Accepted Solution

    >We are using the EMC proprietary software PowerPath to allow for both servers to access the same physical drive simultaneously.

    No, Powerpath is to sort out multiple connections to the LUN, without it you would see the same disk 4 times in disk manager. It isn't clustering software and it doesn't do anything to leverage shared LUNs. Your E: driver is bound to become corrupt pretty quick, it's not a case of writing to the same file but to the same filesystem, since the FAT is stored in RAM rather than instantly committed to disk they'll overwrite each other's files because they don't even know the other server's written them there.

    Splitting into 2 LUNs and using DFS is one option (you don't need a SAN of course but you've already got one) or you could buy StorNext from Quantum which is a shared filesystem unlike NTFS.
    LVL 67

    Expert Comment

    This question has been classified as abandoned and is closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See the recommendation for more details.

    Write Comment

    Please enter a first name

    Please enter a last name

    We will never share this with anyone.

    Featured Post

    How your wiki can always stay up-to-date

    Quip doubles as a “living” wiki and a project management tool that evolves with your organization. As you finish projects in Quip, the work remains, easily accessible to all team members, new and old.
    - Increase transparency
    - Onboard new hires faster
    - Access from mobile/offline

    Article by: kevp75
    Hey folks, 'bout time for me to come around with a little tip. Thanks to IIS 7.5 Extensions and Microsoft (well... really Windows 8, and IIS 8 I guess...), we can now prime our Application Pools, when IIS starts. Now, though it would be nice t…
    this article is a guided solution for most of the common server issues in server hardware tasks we are facing in our routine job works. the topics in the following article covered are, 1) dell hardware raidlevel (Perc) 2) adding HDD 3) how t…
    This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application and how to execute it on the appropriate database. Log onto the server running the Backup Exec database. In a larger environment, this would generally be …
    This tutorial will give a short introduction and overview of Backup Exec 2012 and how to navigate and perform basic functions. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, are global settings for the application such as conne…

    737 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

    Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

    Join & Ask a Question

    Need Help in Real-Time?

    Connect with top rated Experts

    22 Experts available now in Live!

    Get 1:1 Help Now