[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 3602
  • Last Modified:

Calculating IOPS of current SAN and possible replacement SAN

I'm currently in the early stages of replacing 2 IBM SANs with possible an 2 HP EVA 4400s.
In our current environment we have:
IBM DS 4300 (14) 2Gb Fc 146GB 10k drives
IBM DS 4700 (16) 4Gb Fc 300GB 15K drives
Can someone please give me a rought calculation on the IOPS of each of those SANs?  I should note that each are configured as seperate storage spaces.

I'm looking at replacing those with:
(2) HP StorageWorks EVA 4400 (24) 300GB  15K drives
What would be the IOPS of this kit?

Any input\feedback is greatly appreciated.
0
bermudahs
Asked:
bermudahs
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
6 Solutions
 
Larry LarmeuManaging DirectorCommented:
Here's a good IOPS calculator: http://www.wmarow.com/strcalc/
0
 
bermudahsAuthor Commented:
sorry didn't find that helpful as i couldn't plug in the type of hard drives i have
0
 
driskolltCommented:
RAW IOPS you're looking at (using 120 for 10k and 180 IOPS for 15k)
DS 4300 (120 IOPS * 14 disks)- ~1680 IOPS
DS 4700 (180 IOPS * 16 disks)- ~2880 IOPS

The new array (180 IOPS * 24 disks)- ~4320 IOPS

Your RAID type also has a lot to do with the amount of IOPS you'll see.  What RAID type are you using on the current and new setup?  What is your read/write ratio?  You'll see less than these numbers at the host level once you account for RAID write penatly.

0
A Cyber Security RX to Protect Your Organization

Join us on December 13th for a webinar to learn how medical providers can defend against malware with a cyber security "Rx" that supports a healthy technology adoption plan for every healthcare organization.

 
bermudahsAuthor Commented:
Let me get back to you in terms of what the RAID level on what the IBM SANs are currently using.
In the meantime - in order to get the 24 disks - 4320 IOPS, I'll have to configure the 2 EVA4400's as 1 mas storage?
0
 
andyalderSaggar makers bottom knockerCommented:
If you wanted 24 disks in one you would buy one EVA4400 and one (or two) M6412A FC Drive Enclosure to expand it, not two EVA4400s. EVA4400 scales up to 8 drive enclosures, the starter kits have one enclosure included with them.

As already noted above it's the raw disks IOPS that matters as far as performance goes, an EVA with 24 disks isn't going to be significantly faster than an IBM DS series with the same amount.
0
 
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
I think you also need to take into account the IOPS bottleneck in the controllers as well.

The IBM DS range (based on the Engenio/LSI now NetApps DS range) has a well known bottleneck in the controller.
0
 
andyalderSaggar makers bottom knockerCommented:
I didn't know of a controller bottleneck on Engenios unless you mean that the single controller models disable the write cache by default which leads to horrendous write performance with RAID 5 unless you force it to be enabled.
0
 
driskolltCommented:
The controllers add a little overhead, but with spinning disks, it really all comes down to the disks.  Every storage vendor tries to sell you a product by trying to convince you that there's some magic inside their array that makes their spinning disks different from everyone else.  It all comes down to the disks.  Cache is nice and adds a lot of performance benefit, but if you write to disks faster than the cache can be flushed to disk, your cache will fill up and become useless.

So I guess my point is.  It all comes down to the spinning disks.

If you're using SSDs, or an array with a lots of DRAM cache (symmetrix) - Then it's a bit different.
0
 
bermudahsAuthor Commented:
closing.
0
 
bermudahsAuthor Commented:
I've requested that this question be closed as follows:

Accepted answer: 0 points for bermudahs's comment http:/Q_27031426.html#36047121

for the following reason:

answered own question
0
 
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
Too much input from experts
0

Featured Post

New Tabletop Appliances Blow Competitors Away!

WatchGuard’s new T15, T35 and T55 tabletop UTMs provide the highest-performing security inspection in their class, allowing users at small offices, home offices and distributed enterprises to experience blazing-fast Internet speeds without sacrificing enterprise-grade security.

  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now