DEFclub
asked on
exch 2010 database size management
In Exchange 2003, I would create multiple databases and set policy limits to keep those databases to a reasonable size for restore purposes. This resulted in having quite a few data stores.
Is the same logic true for Exch 2010? Having many database sized to achieve a recovery time objective? Im currently running DAG too. Any database size best practice advice is welcome.
Thxs
Is the same logic true for Exch 2010? Having many database sized to achieve a recovery time objective? Im currently running DAG too. Any database size best practice advice is welcome.
Thxs
Last Comment
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
ASKER
I've heard that unlike Exch 2k3, you can keep Tlogs on the same Raid5 partition as the database. True?
RAID1/10 is better for logs. Check more from below link
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832792.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832792.aspx
ASKER
Going to open a new post with 1 last question requarding Tlogs
Exchange
Exchange is the server side of a collaborative application product that is part of the Microsoft Server infrastructure. Exchange's major features include email, calendaring, contacts and tasks, support for mobile and web-based access to information, and support for data storage.
213K
Questions
--
Followers
--
Top Experts
Get a personalized solution from industry experts
TRUSTED BY
I agree with MegaNuk3. Secondly, bigger db's - corruption risks are more, as MS still unable to do any changes at db level. Still Jet db version.
Small db's will give better performance and less time for restore.