Avatar of shadow2007
shadow2007

asked on 

Active directory DR

can someone give me a brief overview on which method of DR to use in what scenario ?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727048.aspx

it doesnt look very clear as to which option is right when performing DR (Non-authoritative vs authoritative ..and so on)

Active DirectoryDisaster RecoveryWindows Server 2003

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Mike Kline
Avatar of BDoellefeld
BDoellefeld
Flag of United States of America image

In a way this depends on what you're doing for a DR solution.

Basically.. If all the domain controllers are permanently gone you'll want the authoritative restore.
Avatar of shadow2007
shadow2007

ASKER

ok this is the scenario
forest -> child
and if I were to rebuild the child DC from scratch
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of ActiveDirectoryman
ActiveDirectoryman

Blurred text
THIS SOLUTION IS ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
See Pricing Options
Start Free Trial

you dont ever do an authoritative restor unless you have no other option. this is a major operation and you should seek guidance from a microsoft support professional or field engineer.
You would normally do the above procedure to restore any deleted objects.  However when it comes to DR with a DC I usually put a lag DC in place which will be 24hrs behind.  If you do run into any issues with your live AD you know the changes has not yet replicated to the lag DC. The only issue with this is when it is replicated then its no longer behind.
Avatar of Mike Kline
Mike Kline
Flag of United States of America image

One nice thing is that with the recycle bin in 2008 R2 an authoritative restore is almost never needed.

Not sure if you have seen this guide from Gil and Guido

http://www.gilkirkpatrick.com/Blog/file.axd?file=NetPro_ADDR_Guide.pdf

...probably the best DR I've read.

Thanks

Mike
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2003

Windows Server 2003 was based on Windows XP and was released in four editions: Web, Standard, Enterprise and Datacenter. It also had derivative versions for clusters, storage and Microsoft’s Small Business Server. Important upgrades included integrating Internet Information Services (IIS), improvements to Active Directory (AD) and Group Policy (GP), and the migration to Automated System Recovery (ASR).

129K
Questions
--
Followers
--
Top Experts
Get a personalized solution from industry experts
Ask the experts
Read over 600 more reviews

TRUSTED BY

IBM logoIntel logoMicrosoft logoUbisoft logoSAP logo
Qualcomm logoCitrix Systems logoWorkday logoErnst & Young logo
High performer badgeUsers love us badge
LinkedIn logoFacebook logoX logoInstagram logoTikTok logoYouTube logo