asked on # discrete mathematics

1. prove by mathematical induction that: 1+2^n<=3^n for all n>=1.

2. give an example or prove that there are none.

a) a simple graph with degrees 1,2,2,3.

b) a simple graph with degrees 2,3,4,4,4.

c) a simple graph with degrees 1,1,2,4.

2. give an example or prove that there are none.

a) a simple graph with degrees 1,2,2,3.

b) a simple graph with degrees 2,3,4,4,4.

c) a simple graph with degrees 1,1,2,4.

Math / Science

Generally, when you ask us to do your homework for you, we prefer you show what you've done, or ask a specific question as to what you don't understand. Posting the exact text of your homework is a good way to get a visit from the moderators = )

for question 1, i went this far:

for n=1, 1+2^1<=3^1 is true

suppose 1+2^k<=3^k and let's show that 1+2^(k+1)<=3^(k+1) (this is where i'm stranded and can't move forward).

for question 2,

a) represent 4 nodes with the associations

b)there is no example because the sum of the degrees 2+3+4+4+4=17 is odd.

c)there is no example because the highest degree for a 4-node simple graph is 3.

now i'm awaiting your answers.

for n=1, 1+2^1<=3^1 is true

suppose 1+2^k<=3^k and let's show that 1+2^(k+1)<=3^(k+1) (this is where i'm stranded and can't move forward).

for question 2,

a) represent 4 nodes with the associations

b)there is no example because the sum of the degrees 2+3+4+4+4=17 is odd.

c)there is no example because the highest degree for a 4-node simple graph is 3.

now i'm awaiting your answers.

For question 1:

Suppose 1 + 2^k <= 3^k for an k >= 1

you may try multiplying both side with (1+2) and see what happens.

Suppose 1 + 2^k <= 3^k for an k >= 1

you may try multiplying both side with (1+2) and see what happens.

Experts Exchange is like having an extremely knowledgeable team sitting and waiting for your call. Couldn't do my job half as well as I do without it!

James Murphy

it does not help me. suggest something different please.

Log in or sign up to see answer

Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL

Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform

or

Learn why we charge membership fees

We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.

Not exactly the question you had in mind?

Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.

ask a question
Upon expanding, I would have:

1+2^k+2+2^(k+1) <= 3^(k+1)

=> 1+2^(k+1)+2+2^k <= 3^(k+1)

we know that 1+2^(k+1) <= 1+2^(k+1)+2+2^k, therefore we have: 1+2^(k+1) <= 3^(k+1).

this completes the mathematical induction. Am I right?

1+2^k+2+2^(k+1) <= 3^(k+1)

=> 1+2^(k+1)+2+2^k <= 3^(k+1)

we know that 1+2^(k+1) <= 1+2^(k+1)+2+2^k, therefore we have: 1+2^(k+1) <= 3^(k+1).

this completes the mathematical induction. Am I right?

Spot on, just need to complete with check of initial value (e.g. 2)

Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.

Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.

Thank you so much for your help. Would you mind assisting me with question 2?