• Status: Solved
• Priority: Medium
• Security: Public
• Views: 349

# Query using dates to determine on time record

I have a query (see snapshot) which I have added a field to (ReschDate).  The query has been used to determine if an order was delivered on time or not.  Currently the "OnTime" field looks at "DateShpd" and compares it to "Ack_Date".  If DateShpd" is <= Ack_Date then the answer is Y.

But now we want to compare "DateShpd" to EITHER "Ack_Date" OR "ReschDate" using the higher valued date from "Ack_Date" or "ReschDate".  So if DateShpd is <= the higher of the values, Ack_Date or ReschDate" the the answer should be "Y".  If not then the answer should be "N".

How can I rework this query to handle this?
0
SteveL13
• 5
• 3
• 2
• +1
1 Solution

Commented:
Nested IIFs?

iif([DateShpd]<=iif([Ack_Date]>[ReschDate],[Ack_Date],[ReschDate]),"Y","N")
0

Commented:
I use a function for this.

OnTime: iif([DateShpd] < fnMax([Ack_Date], [ReschDate]), "Y", "N")

The advantage of the function is that it will take as many parameters as you want to pass it, and it automatically ignor NULLs.
``````Public Function fnMax(ParamArray ValList() As Variant) As Variant

Dim intLoop As Integer
Dim myVal As Variant

For intLoop = LBound(ValList) To UBound(ValList)
If Not IsNull(ValList(intLoop)) Then
If IsEmpty(myVal) Then
myVal = ValList(intLoop)
ElseIf ValList(intLoop) > myVal Then
myVal = ValList(intLoop)
End If
End If
Next
fnMax = myVal

End Function
``````
0

Commented:
Switch to your SQL view, and change your WHERE clause to something like this:

WHERE IIf(Nz(Ack_Date, 0) >= Nz(ReschDate, 0), Nz(Ack_Date, 0), ReschDate) Between Forms![Name of form]![name of start date] And Forms![Name of form]![name of end date]

The Nz is in there in case there is any possibility of those date columns containing nulls.
0

Commented:
Note that in c1nmo's suggestion http:#a36473608, if Ack_Date is not null but ReschDate is null, the whole thing is going to evaluate to false, because any logical comparison between a null and a non-null is always false.

Of course, if those columns are not nullable, then there is no need to worry.

:)
0

Author Commented:
I have not tried any of the suggestion yet but I did forget to mention that "Ack_Date" will always have a value.  In some records "ReschDate" will not have a value.  Therefore, “On Time” is Y if "DateShpd" is on or before the latest of those two dates and N if after both dates.

Which suggestion will deal with the null "ReschDate" issue?

--Steve
0

Commented:
My function will handle the possible NULL value in [ReschDate]
0

Commented:
My suggestion in http:#a36473628 will handle nulls.  If Ack_Date can never be null, it can be simplified a bit:

WHERE IIf(Ack_Date >= Nz(ReschDate, 0), Ack_Date, ReschDate) Between Forms![Name of form]![name of start date] And Forms![Name of form]![name of end date]
0

Commented:
Sorry, did not mean to suggest that fyed's suggestion will not handle nulls.  It will, of course :)
0

Commented:
Aside to fyed: you might be interested in my RowStats function, which behaves similarly to yours, except that it can do all of the typical aggregations:

http://www.experts-exchange.com/Microsoft/Development/MS_Access/A_1775-Computing-row-wise-aggregations-in-Access.html

:)
0

Author Commented:
Works perfectly.  Thanks.
0

Commented:
Patrick,

I've seen it and like it but I've been using my fnMin and fnMax for about 10 years and for most of my stuff they are sufficient.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.