Reverse Masking. I have at network 172.16.16.0 255.255.254.0

In need to not nat the first 100 ip address of this subnet and nat the remaining ip addressess.  I'm using a Cisco router and access-lists  I'm having trouble what the reverse masking should be on the first line of this access-list and also the easiest way to caluclate it
example
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.?.?  any
access-list 146 permit ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.1.225 any

Thanks
swensonjAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
 
Otto_NConnect With a Mentor Commented:
Wildcard masking works the same as subnet masking, but just in reverse. (SM is 11111...100...0, while WC-mask is 000...011..1).  So wildcards masks also have the same characteristic than subnet masks:  It can only group IP's in groups of the power of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, ...

So, to get to the 100 IP's, you use a group of 63, a group of 32, a group of 4 (and a group of 1, if you want to exclude .100 also).  But if you have any freedom in the choice of the exclusion range, allign it with the powers of 2:  Either exclude 63 addresses (172.16.16.0-63, with "access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.63") or 127 (172.16.16.0-127, with "access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.127").  This prevents using multiple access-list entries.
0
 
Jan SpringerCommented:
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.63
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.31
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.3
0
 
lrmooreCommented:
How about this one

access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.63
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.64 0.0.0.31
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.96 0.0.0.3
access-list 146 deny ip host 172.16.16.100
access-list 146 permit ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.1.255 any

0
The new generation of project management tools

With monday.com’s project management tool, you can see what everyone on your team is working in a single glance. Its intuitive dashboards are customizable, so you can create systems that work for you.

 
swensonjAuthor Commented:
Can you guys explain why you did the access list this way?  I assume that one access-list with one reverse mask could be used instead of the 3 and 4 described above

Thanks
0
 
SanjeevlokeCommented:
u said 100 IP dont require natting so.
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.63 =64 IP
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.64 0.0.0.31=32 IP
access-list 146 deny ip 172.16.16.96 0.0.0.3 =4 IP
Total 100IP

access-list 146 permit ip 172.16.16.0 0.0.1.255 any ----rest all will be permitted ..


0
 
swensonjAuthor Commented:
Thanks
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.