Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of snwl-itservices
snwl-itservices

asked on

read only problem in windows 7 machines

Few days back I had put a request to install windows 7 on one of my dev PC.
It went smooth but I found a mysterious problem where all the folders on the drives are in read only state.
 I googled it and found that number of users have already reported this issue on windows 7.
 Do you have any work around for this problem.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of johnb6767
johnb6767
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Try turning off Usr Account Control.

If not then maybe set up a new user account.

If that doesn't work then you could try the slightly more involved way to do folder by folder:

Click Start, click Run, type cmd, and then press Enter. (If the Run command is not listed on the Start menu, Click Start, click All Programs, click Accessories, and then click Run.)
To remove the Read-only attribute, at the command prompt type the following command:
attrib -r drive:\<path>\<foldername>

You may also need to remove the System attribute. In that case, use the command:
attrib -r -s drive:\<path>\<foldername>
As a matter of fact, the Read O:nly attribute clearly states "Only applies to files in folder"..... Whats the actual problem you are having? Or are you just curious?

If just curious, don't worry about it as nothing is broken....
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
I've requested that this question be deleted for the following reason:

This question has been classified as abandoned and is closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See the recommendation for more details.
The author never provided any feedback, and apparently hasn't visited Experts Exchange since originally posting the question.  However, this is a fairly common misconception and I think that it might be more appropriate to close this question with a split between two comments:  http:#36488663 and http:#36488677
My recommendation was previously stated in http:#36898277