Solved

SBS 2011 and Server 2008 R2 Terminal Best Practice for File serving?

Posted on 2011-09-06
9
657 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
EE,

I'm in the process of building 2 servers of identical spec (Quad, 16GB Ram, 250GB SSDs Raid).

One to be SBS 2011, controlling all 20 users
One to be Server 2008 R2 as Terminal Server

Note - We have 15 LAN users (all use Sage 50/user files/email) and 5 Remote users (all use email via HTTP, 1 uses Sage 50 via TS, 4 use LOB s/ware via TS)

The way i see it (correct me if i'm wrong) i have a choice on where to store user files and also Sage shared data files.

Mainly from a speed prospective for the LAN users, where would it be best to store user files and Sage 50 data files, on the SBS box or the TS box?

Or is the differnce going to be v.little?

Many thanks.
Joe
0
Comment
Question by:joefolkes
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
9 Comments
 
LVL 14

Expert Comment

by:setasoujiro
ID: 36492496
I would store it on the SBS, mainly because it has all the fileserver roles installed without any hassle. also i would recommend to have a TS do nothing else but be a workstation for people.
so if someone for some reason breaks the TS , you still have the fileserver safe
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:connectex
ID: 36492752
Use SBS for e-mail, file storage, print server. Use TS for remote access only. Think of RDS (TS was old name) as a glorifed workstation. It should have any roles but RDS and related functionality.

-Matt-
0
 
LVL 13

Assisted Solution

by:connectex
connectex earned 100 total points
ID: 36492774
That should have been:

The TS server shouldn't have any roles but RDS Host and other RDS functionality (licensing, gateway, etc).

-Matt-
0
Resolve Critical IT Incidents Fast

If your data, services or processes become compromised, your organization can suffer damage in just minutes and how fast you communicate during a major IT incident is everything. Learn how to immediately identify incidents & best practices to resolve them quickly and effectively.

 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:delandale
ID: 36494159
Although I completely agree with all of the previous comments, it may be worth noting that on our network (gigabit switch / nics) doing an end-of-year run in Sage can take hours. Copying the data to the local drive, running the year-end, then copying the data back is the only way around the issue we can find.

It may be beneficial to locate your sage data on the TS in a secured folder with appropriate permissions and ensure it is backed up regularly to the SBS (possibly via DFSr)?
0
 

Author Comment

by:joefolkes
ID: 36494520
The reason i ask about speed is like Delandale, we have Sage speed issues currently (SBS 2003 box) over the newtwork.

So considering most say leave the TS for RDS only.

Would it now be better to consider a standalone NAS for user files and Sage data files.

Or will there be no speeed advantage over leaving on the SBS 2011 box?

Thanks,Joe
0
 
LVL 14

Accepted Solution

by:
setasoujiro earned 200 total points
ID: 36494528
I don't see any speed advantage putting on a nas, actually the speed will certainly increase if you have a raid array in the servers with sas disks?
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:delandale
delandale earned 200 total points
ID: 36494531
None. The data will still be traversing the network over the same speed connection as the SBS box. As I said, the only way we have found that works is to copy the data locally to perform any data-intensive  operation then copy back. Your choices are either put up with the speed issue, do as we do or move data to secure folder on TS
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:delandale
ID: 36494539
Any drive array performance increase will not affect this scenario as the bottleneck is the network
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:joefolkes
ID: 36508259
Happy with everyone's views - thanks
0

Featured Post

Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

New Windows 7 Installations take days for Windows-Updates to show up and install. This can easily be fixed. I have finally decided to write an article because this seems to get asked several times a day lately. This Article and the Links apply to…
Resolving an irritating Remote Desktop connection that stops your saved credentials from being used.
To efficiently enable the rotation of USB drives for backups, storage pools need to be created. This way no matter which USB drive is installed, the backups will successfully write without any administrative intervention. Multiple USB devices need t…
This tutorial will show how to configure a single USB drive with a separate folder for each day of the week. This will allow each of the backups to be kept separate preventing the previous day’s backup from being overwritten. The USB drive must be s…

729 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question