abstract class without abstract methods
i would like to now about
abstract class without abstract methods
When, why, how, where we use it. I was under impression that abstract should have atleast 1 abstract method in it. I was not clear on this concept. thanks in advance
abstract class without abstract methods
When, why, how, where we use it. I was under impression that abstract should have atleast 1 abstract method in it. I was not clear on this concept. thanks in advance
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SO when you declare such class you mean that those who woul use it can only extend it but cannot use it as it is.
This question has been classified as abandoned and is closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See the recommendation for more details.
http://www.codestyle.org/java/faq-Abstract.shtml#whynoabstract
Q: Why do we need abstract classes with no abstract methods?
A: An abstract class without any abstract methods should be a rare thing and you should always question your application design if this case arises. Normally you should refactor to use a concrete superclass in this scenario.
One specific case where abstract class may justifiably have no abstract methods is where it partially implements an interface, with the intention that its subclasses must complete the interface. To take a slightly contrived motoring analogy, a Chassis class may partially implement a Vehicle interface and provide a set of core methods from which a range of concrete Vehicle types are extended. Chassis is not a viable implementation of a Vehicle in its own right, so a concrete Car subclass would have to implement interface methods for functional wheels, engine and bodywork.