Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 332
  • Last Modified:

W2003 Domain Controller demotion

I have one flat W2003 server domain with 2 Domain Controllers. I need to demote 1 Domain Controller so I end up with only 1 Domain Controller. Please let me know steps necessary in order to avoid any problems. This is a production environment.
0
virtech
Asked:
virtech
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
1 Solution
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
Make a FULL backup of both servers.

Transfer any FSMO roles it may hold to the other server.

Make sure the other server is both a DNS server and Global Catalog.

Make sure DNS is configured on the remaining server so it's not using the one to be removed.

Run DCPROMO and demote.
0
 
Mike KlineCommented:
First of all if this is production not recommended to only run with 1 DC

You use dcpromo to demote   http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771844(WS.10).aspx#BKMK_remove_domain_interface

If the box holds any FSMO roles transfer them.

Make sure if this box is running DNS that the other one also has DNS and clients are pointing to it.

...but again try to run with 2 DCs.  Just think if you only have one and that crashes hard.  

Thanks


Mike
0
 
virtechAuthor Commented:
Best pratices dictate 2 Domain Controllers.

Cost constraints demand 1 domain controller.

Who's correct: Accounting or IT?
0
Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

 
Mike KlineCommented:
You have to tell Accounting what is the cost if the single DC goes down and what is that outage worth to the company.

If you have one DC and that dies hard (major hardware failure for example) you will have definite downtime for users with hours/days worth of work.

If you have two then the users should not even notice(or barely notice) if one dies hard.

It is not a lot of money to build a low end second DC.

Thanks

Mike
0
 
virtechAuthor Commented:
Good point.
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
I do agree- going down to 1 DC is dangerous and you should have two.

How is reducing a DC going to decrease costs?  If you pay for maintenance by an IT company, then logically, YOU are not asking this question because the IT company should be doing this at your request.

Power costs are minimal - $100-200 per year.  

Admin/Maintenance costs - if one server is going to be the deciding factor in laying someone off, then you're probably doing WAAAAAAAAAAY to much to "maintain" the server.  Basic monitoring and maintenance should amount to just a couple of hours per month.  If that.
0
 
virtechAuthor Commented:
Yeah, it's a bit complicated. I'm in charge of making this happen but they have an outside IT company who charges them per device supported. I'm supposed to reduce their devices so they pay less per month.
0
 
SandeshdubeyCommented:
You can explain the cleint about impact of single DC in the enviroment and let the decision be taken by client on the same.

If they still want to continue with removal of DC.Ran dcpromo to remove the DC from network.Also check the FSMO role if the server you are planning to demote is FSMO role holder then you have to transfer the role to other DC before you proceed with removal.

Also the cleint PC should point to the existing online DC i.e change all of the clients , to point to the online DC for their preferred DNS server this may be in DHCP options or the TCP/IP settings.


0

Featured Post

Simplify Active Directory Administration

Administration of Active Directory does not have to be hard.  Too often what should be a simple task is made more difficult than it needs to be.The solution?  Hyena from SystemTools Software.  With ease-of-use as well as powerful importing and bulk updating capabilities.

  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now