Solved

How validating a validated software for a new environment?

Posted on 2011-09-08
1
442 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-13
Hello,

I've developed an add-in for Microsoft Excel 2007 and validated it by covering all the software requirements by tests, which have been executed, recorded, analysed and documented.

I've made a new version of the add-in for Microsoft Excel 2010, the functionalities are exactly the same (it's the same code), but I've just changed the setup project to create different registry keys during the installation, and the version of the .NET framework used is different (.NET 4 instead of .NET 2).

I'm not sure about what to do for validating this new version of the add-in in a quick but correct manner. As the code has not changed, I think I should not re-test all the software requirements.
I'm thinking about documenting a risk analysis to list the changes between Office 2007 and Office 2010 that could affect the add-in and determine if some functionalities have to be re-tested. Then testing these functionalities (if any) and the new installer (by checking that the add-in and the pre-requisites are correctly installed, and the add-in is correctly loaded in Excel after installation), and make some general testing to verify that the critical functionalities are working.

What do you think about this approach, would you have some comments or advice?

Thanks in advance,
Julien
0
Comment
Question by:JulienVan
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
LeeeRussell earned 500 total points
ID: 36509013
You could use the method you suggest, but my worry would be that there is no way that you can find out what changes Microsoft has made to the underlying code between the two versions.  You might be able to analyse the functional differences between 2007 and 2010, but you won't know the internals.

Saying that, it still depends on a lot of factors.  If this plugin was a tool that I was releasing within the company I was working at, for internal use only, then I would say that your method was satisfactory.  If you are releasing this to the public as a product, then I would say that you need to re-run your tests.

Fundamentally, this may be the point where you start automating your tests and re-running them is very little effort.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Learn by example how to specify CSS selectors for Selenium WebDriver test automation software.
This article was originally published on Monitis Blog, you can check it here . If you have responsibility for software in production, I bet you’d like to know more about it. I don’t mean that you’d like an extra peek into the bowels of the sourc…
XMind Plus helps organize all details/aspects of any project from large to small in an orderly and concise manner. If you are working on a complex project, use this micro tutorial to show you how to make a basic flow chart. The software is free when…
This video Micro Tutorial shows how to password-protect PDF files with free software. Many software products can do this, such as Adobe Acrobat (but not Adobe Reader), Nuance PaperPort, and Nuance Power PDF, but they are not free products. This vide…

688 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question