Mapping - List

As you may know - I have asked a question about how to turn 2 arrayList in to 1.  I have received a great suggestion and plan on using it.  But during the process, I was looking at Maps.  I really have never used Maps in code before.  I was doing something like this.

Map <List<TCComponent>, List<TCComponent>> map = new HashMap<List<TCComponent>, List<TCComponent>>();

Iterator<?> it = revisionList.iterator();
      while (it.hasNext()){
      map.put(revisionList, datasetList);

Open in new window

But that can not work because both things I am putting in to MAP each are list and may be more than one entry.

So my question is how do you put values in a map from listArrays? and when you have them in your map how would you print out your map?
Who is Participating?
for_yanConnect With a Mentor Commented:

Well, you create it as in any other case
Let's say you have the keys in one array
String [] keys;
and then you have
values  in the array
String [] values;

And now let's assume that you ca have several
different values corresponding to the same key

keys [1] = "myKey";
value[1] = "value1";

Open in new window

keys[3] = "myKey";
value[3] = "value3

Open in new window

of you juist make hashmap key-value
then when you store third element it will overwrite first element

That's why is this case you want to have
MashMap of the type key vs list of Vlaues

HashMap<String, ArrayList<String>>  m = new HashMap<String, ArrayList<String>>  () ;

for(int j=0; j<keys.length; j++){
if(m.get(keys[j]) == null){
ArrayList <String> ar = new ArrayList<String>();

} else
ArrayList <String> ar = m.get(keys[j]);

Open in new window

So after you run thorough all your jeys-values pairs
you'll get you HashMap m,
which will store lists of values against the
keys which are strings
(there is a way even to make that code inside the loop a few lines shorter,
but I like this way - because it is very illustrative)

as i said when you just


it will print the HashMap in a reasonable format
thanks to good toString() methods of both HashMap
and ArrayList

It is not commopn to have a List as a key.
It uis quirte OK rto have a List a s a wvalue - but suggest hwne would you want to have a list as akey ?
difficult to uinvent such case

Why would you want to have a list as a key?
If this list has some uniqe element then use this as a key.
You don;'t want to have the whole list as a key - jkey uis usually integer or unique String, buty not a list
Cloud Class® Course: SQL Server Core 2016

This course will introduce you to SQL Server Core 2016, as well as teach you about SSMS, data tools, installation, server configuration, using Management Studio, and writing and executing queries.

Very normal situation is to have a key - like Integer or String and ArrayList as a value

Then if you need to print in not very beautiful way,
you can just sya

HashMap<Strung, ArrayList<String,STRING>>  m = new HashMap<Strung, ArrayList<String,STRING>>  () ;

// populate


because hashmap and ArrayList bith have reasonavble toString()
you;ll see reasonable printout
jkteaterAuthor Commented:
OK what if my key is a string and the value is a list - how would I create the map then?
jkteaterAuthor Commented:
leaving for the day - be back tomorrow
if you still want to format it differently when printing
you could do it like that:

Set set = m.keySet();
for(String s: set){

System.out.print("key " + s + " :  Values: ");
ArrayList<String> ar = m.get(s);
for(String s1: ar){

System.out.print(s1 + " ");



Open in new window

As i mentioned in your other question - a Map is much more appropriate for what you want to do ;)
>>But that can not work because both things I am putting in to MAP each are list and may be more than one entry.

That is not the case afaicr. There is one 'dataset' with n 'revision'. Only the latter is a List, and even that maybe not, since you said that you wished to prevent > 1 revision.
This is not really the place to discuss this though, since it belongs in the original. I can't remember now though whether that original question is still open
For future viewers of this question, please see http:Q_27293047.html, of which this question is essentially a duplicate in two senses:

a. it duplicates my original suggestion
b. it duplicates the original question
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.