?
Solved

Cisco Catalyst Switch Split

Posted on 2011-09-13
8
Medium Priority
?
614 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
I need to take a 24-port Catalyst switch and basically carve it up into four distinct six-port switches. Each "switch" needs to be completely isolated from the other "switches". I assume VLANs would be required here, however the traffic needs to be free of any VLAN tagging, as it's connected to ISP equipment. These VLANs only need to exist on this one switch. How can this be done so there is no tagging whatsoever?

The longer story (though not completely required) is that we have three ISPs in our office and a redundant pair of Internet routers. Since the ISP equipment only has one port each, this Catalyst switch would split the ISP traffic to each router, as only one will be active at a time, using each of the first three VLANs. Then the LAN traffic from the routers would use the fourth "switch" VLAN to combine links before hitting the office LAN. Image attached.

Thanks!
VLANs.png
0
Comment
Question by:MacGyverSolutions
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
8 Comments
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:Soulja
ID: 36530724
I don't know if I completely understand your requirements, but you should just be able to create the vlans, assigned the ports with switch port access vlan x, switchport mode access. As long as you don't create any trunks there will be no tagging.
0
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Craig Beck
ID: 36531128
Soulja has explained exactly what you need...

This code will put ports 1-6 in VLAN1, 7-12 in VLAN2, 13-18 in VLAN3 and 19-24 in VLAN4...

conf t
vlan 2
exit
vlan 3
exit
vlan 4
exit
int range gi0/1 - 6
 switchport mode access
int range gi0/7-12
 switchport mode access
 switchport access vlan 2
int range gi0/13 - 18
 switchport mode access
 switchport access vlan 3
int range gi0/19 - 24
 switchport mode access
 switchport access vlan 4
end
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:MacGyverSolutions
ID: 36532373
I will try this out soon and let you know, thanks! If I don't specify a VLAN on the first range (1-6), is VLAN 1 assumed, and I will stop getting these native VLAN mismatch errors?
0
Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:Soulja
ID: 36532404
Native vlan mismatch errors? You should not be getting those unless you have trunks configured with mismatch native vlans or have mismatched access ports plugged into each other. Since you are not using trunks I assume the latter.
0
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Craig Beck
ID: 36532677
As Soulja says, you will only get native VLAN mismatch errors if trunks are configured.

If you don't set a VLAN on the first range VLAN1 is assumed by default.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:MacGyverSolutions
ID: 36552508
There was still some weirdness after this change because I was getting "Received 802.1Q BPDU on non trunk FastEthernet0/13 VLAN4" and "Blocking FastEthernet0/13 on VLAN0004. Inconsistent port type" but apparently switching to RPVST fixed this up. Perhaps the ISP was sending their own BPDU packets?

The configuration DOES seem to be working, however the port connected to one of the WAN ports is blinking green/orange back and forth, with short spurts of what appears to be regular activity every minute or so. Anyone know what this pattern means?
0
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
MacGyverSolutions earned 0 total points
ID: 37153965
Ended up resolving this by setting up four individual private VLANs, which do not use spanning-tree, trunks, etc. Appears to be working well.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:MacGyverSolutions
ID: 37175726
Had to use a more customized configuration than I wanted, but it works now. Whoever replaces me someday may not have a clue on how this configuration works.
0

Featured Post

Moving data to the cloud? Find out if you’re ready

Before moving to the cloud, it is important to carefully define your db needs, plan for the migration & understand prod. environment. This wp explains how to define what you need from a cloud provider, plan for the migration & what putting a cloud solution into practice entails.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

So, you're experiencing issues on your network and you've decided that you need to perform some tests to determine whether your cabling is good.  You're likely thinking that you may need to spend money which you probably don't have on hiring/purchas…
As companies replace their old PBX phone systems with Unified IP Communications, many are finding out that legacy applications such as fax do not work well with VoIP. Fortunately, Cloud Faxing provides a cost-effective alternative that works over an…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…
Suggested Courses
Course of the Month9 days, 8 hours left to enroll

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question