Solved

Is my definition of a generic method in Java ok?

Posted on 2011-09-14
13
280 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
Here's my basic definition of a generic method. Is it acceptable?

Generic Method - a method in which type parameters appear within angled brackets, right before the return type. The code below is a generic method that uses an enhanced for loop to add array elements to a collection one by one. The third line of the code would not have compiled if the <T> at the beginning of the method signature was not there. That <T> made it possible for the array and the collection in the method parameter to be typed the same generic way, so that this method would be compatible with any object type.

static <T> void fromArrayToCollection(T[ ] a, Collection<T> c) {
     for (T o : a) {
        c.add(o); // adding an array element of type T
     }
}
0
Comment
Question by:shampouya
  • 9
  • 4
13 Comments
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536407
Yes, this seems fine to me
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536412
if it compiles then it is fine
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536419
And it does compile fro me
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536436
Although my IDE suggest to replcae it withh Collection.addAll method, but this does not matter; once it compiles it measn it is correct
0
 

Author Comment

by:shampouya
ID: 36536452
And the <T> after the word static is what turned this method into a generic method, right?
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536519
Yes, without that "T" in fromt of static compiler would not understdn what means T inside the mthod and in parameters
0
Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536558
So this code compiles fine together with your method definition:

  
        Collection<String> cc = null;
        String [] cmcm = null;
        
            fromArrayToCollection(cmcm, cc);
        

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:shampouya
ID: 36536584
Oh I know it compiles, correctly, I took it from the Oracle website. I was just wondering if my english was correct when I defined a generic method. And I was wondering if the <T> before the return type is what can turn a regular method into a generic method.
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536589

Aslo this compiles:

        Collection<Object> cc = null;
        String [] cmcm = null;

            fromArrayToCollection(cmcm, cc);

Open in new window


but this does not:


Collection<String> cc = null;
        Object [] cmcm = null;

            fromArrayToCollection(cmcm, cc);

Open in new window


This is in compliance with your previous
statements about covariance of arrays and collections
0
 

Author Comment

by:shampouya
ID: 36536608
I'm confused and I'm not sure why you are telling me what compiles.That wasn't my question....
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:for_yan
ID: 36536618
I just liked that your talks about covariance of arrays vs collections in previous question are nicely illustrated by this example
 
0
 
LVL 47

Accepted Solution

by:
for_yan earned 500 total points
ID: 36536657
And about "T" in front:

Compiler has to account for any entity when it parses the code - each entity is either a class or variable name or something
which compiler should yunderstand.
If you don't put "T" in front - it will parse "T" inside the metghod definition - and will not know what it is - when it
saw "T" in front of static it understandts that it is a generic method and will
be able to recignize what is "T" when it parses the contents of the method.

By the way you can use almost arbitrary striung instead of "T" - I replaced "T" by "MyT" in all places and it also works - it is just a tradition to use "T" for "type"
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:shampouya
ID: 36536705
thanks
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Non-recursive backtracking, using a stack 1 103
map related example 6 38
windows explorer path to command prompt 5 33
Oracle SQL syntax check  without executing 6 38
For customizing the look of your lightweight component and making it look lucid like it was made of glass. Or: how to make your component more Apple-ish ;) This tip assumes your component to be of rectangular shape and completely opaque. (COD…
After being asked a question last year, I went into one of my moods where I did some research and code just for the fun and learning of it all.  Subsequently, from this journey, I put together this article on "Range Searching Using Visual Basic.NET …
Viewers will learn about basic arrays, how to declare them, and how to use them. Introduction and definition: Declare an array and cover the syntax of declaring them: Initialize every index in the created array: Example/Features of a basic arr…
Viewers will learn about the regular for loop in Java and how to use it. Definition: Break the for loop down into 3 parts: Syntax when using for loops: Example using a for loop:

863 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

20 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now