jazzIIIlove
asked on
earthquake probability question
Hi there;
Which parameters are used to assess the probability of earthquake to happen in a time frame, magnitude of the earthquake?
I need a generic explanation for this.
Kind regarsd.
Which parameters are used to assess the probability of earthquake to happen in a time frame, magnitude of the earthquake?
I need a generic explanation for this.
Kind regarsd.
Past frequency earthquakes are scale invariant. Each occurrence has no effect on either the frequency or magnitude of another earthquake. Therefore, historical records of the frequency occurrence of an earthquake is the best estimate of the next earthquake regardless if you just had an earthquake yesterday. The magnitude of an earthquake has no relationship to the frequency of an earthquake. It's statistically random.
As such it is a lot like the weather, historical averages of past weather is the best indicator of future weather.
As such it is a lot like the weather, historical averages of past weather is the best indicator of future weather.
That is untrue. Small earthquakes are more frequent than large earthquakes.
And earthquakes are statistically more likely when another earthquake has recently happened.
And earthquakes are statistically more likely when another earthquake has recently happened.
Another possible factor is that over time, pressure can build up along fault lines, making an earthquake increasingly more likely as time passes (in some regions). So the old adage of 'there hasn't been an earthquake here for 50 years, so maybe we are due one soon' could be based on fact.
The entire earth must be factored in, that is, the tectonic plates. If one has a great shift on the other side of the world, you have to look at HOW did it move? Up? Down? Over? Under? Newton's law of physics should pertain: For every action there will be an equal and opposite reaction. Think about Japan, then Chile. How were they related? Which tectonic plates do they share? How could movements travel? It went: Japan's Pacific Plate to the Nazca Plate which happens to border Chile.
http://www.google.ca/imgres?q=tectonic+plate+map+world&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&biw=1280&bih=608&tbm=isch&tbnid=CB0QeGu9_-SNPM:&imgrefurl=http://www.setterfield.org/Weekly%2520Bible%2520Studies/Peleg.html&docid=nQ46o762eI1glM&w=550&h=361&ei=G-pzTonGPOvZiALWwrG0Ag&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=511&vpy=298&dur=988&hovh=104&hovw=159&tx=162&ty=114&page=1&tbnh=104&tbnw=159&start=0&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:8,s:0
Small quakes relieve pressure and are said to reduce the likelihood of 'the BIG ONE', but I don't take chances. lol
http://www.google.ca/imgres?q=tectonic+plate+map+world&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&biw=1280&bih=608&tbm=isch&tbnid=CB0QeGu9_-SNPM:&imgrefurl=http://www.setterfield.org/Weekly%2520Bible%2520Studies/Peleg.html&docid=nQ46o762eI1glM&w=550&h=361&ei=G-pzTonGPOvZiALWwrG0Ag&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=511&vpy=298&dur=988&hovh=104&hovw=159&tx=162&ty=114&page=1&tbnh=104&tbnw=159&start=0&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:8,s:0
Small quakes relieve pressure and are said to reduce the likelihood of 'the BIG ONE', but I don't take chances. lol
Worldwide, each year there are about 18 earthquakes magnitude (M) 7.0 or larger.
Although we are not able to predict individual earthquakes, the world's largest earthquakes do have a clear spatial pattern, and "forecasts" of the locations and magnitudes of some future large earthquakes can be made.
Most large earthquakes occur on long fault zones around the margin of the Pacific Ocean.
This is because the Atlantic Ocean is growing a few inches wider each year, and the Pacific is shrinking as ocean floor is pushed beneath Pacific Rim continents.
http://www.pnsn.org/INFO_GENERAL/eq_prediction.html
Although we are not able to predict individual earthquakes, the world's largest earthquakes do have a clear spatial pattern, and "forecasts" of the locations and magnitudes of some future large earthquakes can be made.
Most large earthquakes occur on long fault zones around the margin of the Pacific Ocean.
This is because the Atlantic Ocean is growing a few inches wider each year, and the Pacific is shrinking as ocean floor is pushed beneath Pacific Rim continents.
http://www.pnsn.org/INFO_GENERAL/eq_prediction.html
Have you experienced an earthquake before?
ASKER
I was in Turkey when there was that earthquake but guys what i am askung is that i need some statistical methods to assess the probability.
E.g. Is the technique, krigging applicable for estimation of an earthquake probability?
If so, is it applicable to utilize this data in Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software (SGEMS)?
Kind regards.
E.g. Is the technique, krigging applicable for estimation of an earthquake probability?
If so, is it applicable to utilize this data in Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software (SGEMS)?
Kind regards.
Although we are not able to predict individual earthquakes, the world's largest earthquakes do have a clear spatial pattern, and "forecasts" of the locations and magnitudes of some future large earthquakes can be made.
The above is the best definitive answer I can find.
Basically, the answer is you can not predict them.
They happen.
The above is the best definitive answer I can find.
Basically, the answer is you can not predict them.
They happen.
ASKER
Hi there;
ok, but i need a statistical approach, not sole theoretical considerations.
Techniques? Krigging can be applicable to those? If so, how?
Kind regards.
ok, but i need a statistical approach, not sole theoretical considerations.
Techniques? Krigging can be applicable to those? If so, how?
Kind regards.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Ah, That's good but where is the link?
Kind regards.
Kind regards.
ASKER
ok I found the link. Thanks.
The best results are due to extensive study of fault lines. Laser beams have been used to detect small shifts across faults. If the shifts increase, earthquake warnings are given.
An increase in the number of small earthquakes is a warning signal.
Conversely a decrease in small earthquakes is a warning sign because fault stress is not being relived.