Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Dusty
DustyFlag for United States of America

asked on

low PR backlinks Good or Bad?

I have a PR3 site that has been around for about 15 years, and I recently started up a couple of new sites that are similar (housing related) and on both these new sites I added an IDX feed with thousands of pages and in each page footer there are links back to my main PR3 site. Since doing so, my rankings have dropped a little and I was wondering if having a massive amount of backlinks from one domain could hurt??

Thanks!
Avatar of jhoekman
jhoekman
Flag of United States of America image

Although usually I would say that low PR backlinks aren't going to hurt you, it looks like your strategy of adding 'thousands of pages' with 'links in each page footer' is definitely hurting you. Google looks at various things when considering the value of a link, whether positive or negative.  Adding a bunch of links to quickly from one domain could easily be the cause of your drop in traffic.  

Another cause could be that the feeds you added to the other sites are actually stealing authority from your main site, and rather than adding new traffic, you are actually cannibalizing the traffic from your main site.  

Has your combined traffic between all sites increased?  
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Matthew Nguyen
Matthew Nguyen
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

yes my strategy was that I can get lots of low quality backlinks from some secondary sites and it wouldnt hurt my main site, and over time, google would see that these links were still there and hopefully the secondard sites, over time would gather some PR from links coming from other sites. Then those links would start being meaningful...maybe 2 years down the road.
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

i didnt mean "low quality" because I meant low PR
I think that is the Catch 22 that you are in being that now, because your links are coming from low authority sites and a lot of them, that is playing a role in you drop in rankings.

What I would do, just to see if this is correct, is to remove all the footer links and see if your rankings come back.  But as far as right now, it looks like this method is hurting you more than it is helping you.

Matt
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

so if having lots of links from a new domain can hurt your site, what would keep people from say adding links to another competeing site? and bringing it down... I figured google had something in the algorithm that would stop that from happening.  I was thinking the drop in traffic could be due to the anchor text I used. Maybe I should just link back to the domain without using any keyword rich anchor text?? any thoughts on that?
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

BTW I did remove the links a few days ago and I'm monitoring the situation.
>>>what would keep people from say adding links to another competeing site? and bringing it down...

That is a great question, and a supporting case for why I don't think that having too many links can have a drastic impact on your site.  However, you also need to remember that through C-block analysis of your IP, Google can detect where each site is being served from and who owns the content.  It could be that they have determined that you own all of the sites and are trying to manipulate the system and giving you a little slap in return.

BUT, I go back to the cannibalization of referrals, again, as a possible cause for your drop in traffic.  When you look at the traffic for all of your sites combined, are they increasing or decreasing?
Sure, there are things that Google has set in place in order to track those things and if you really wanted to put the effort into taking down your competitor, you could, but the time and effort in doing so would be quite intensive.  In the same sense, the Google algorithm can see where you are getting links and therefore not give your site any value for those things.  Which then defeats the purpose of your strategy because even if those sites start to gain authority in a year or two, those links wouldn't count towards your site.

Again, the method in which you are trying to backlinks is probably triggering something in the algorithm because it is unnatural.  (Massive amount of links from the same website with the exact same anchor text and in the footer).  I'm not sure if changing the anchor text will help because your massive amount of links from the same website and the links are found in the footer.  

That's my 2 cents, again, is that the cause of your rankings to drop, it could be.  Would testing the removal of the links from your new sites be difficult for you to do?
Sorry posted before I saw your second comment, it would be interested to see any results from that.
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

"cannibalization of referrals" I dont really understand that? can you put that in lay terms?
thanks!
Sure thing!

You have pages on your site that are earning referrals on Site A.

You build another site, Site B, and through RSS feeds, those same pages now appear on another site, in essence creating two pages--one on Site A and one on Site B.

Now, Google comes along, sees both pages and sees they are duplicate.  It picks the best one for one of many different reasons, which happens to be Site B.  

Now, Site B is getting the traffic for that page that Site A used to be getting, in essence, cannibalizing the referrals from site A.

Thus, traffic from Site A drops and traffic from site B increases.   But, because you own both sites, your overall, or net, traffic loss/gain is a wash.  

In this example, if you were only looking at the drop in traffic from A and not taking into account the possible transfer of traffic to site B, you might inaccurately assume that your rank has dropped, when really, the traffic has just been taken or cannibalized by one of your other sites and you are actually fine overall.

Does that helps?
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

Oh you mean is my rankings on my secondary sites driving down the rankings for my main site on my main kwywords/phrases?
No, I mean that it might have nothing to do with your rankings at all.  It might just be that Site B is now getting the traffic from pages that Site A used to be getting.  This can happen without a drop in rankings at all.

Remember, traffic is not just about ranking.  It's about number of pages on your site, the % of those pages in Google's index, the volume of search queries you rank for, the click-through rate of those pages, etc.  Any one of those things can go awry and you can see a drop in traffic as a result.  That's why it's so important to be measuring all of these metrics so that if/when you lose traffic, you can attribute it to the right metric and fix it.  

Does that help?
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

Oh I see, no the pages are all unique, and there is no RSS feed on either of the secondary (new) sites. These sites are also for housing in different geographic regions and split up between 3 different webhosts.
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

both the new sites use a canonical tag on every page so there wont be any duplicates (hopefully)
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Dusty

ASKER

thanks guys, since I removed the footer links, I'm going to watch this for a few weeks and report back here what happens.
Excellent.  Good luck!