Solved

concurent UNC connection limit

Posted on 2011-09-16
4
2,121 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
I have a standard 2008 r2 server that i am using as a file server, and BizTalk 2009 running on a enterprise 2008 r2 server.  BizTalk has a couple thousand UNC recieve locations looking at the file server.  i can only have 512 of those recieve locations turned on at a time.  If i try and turn on more, they will eventaly fail with an error like: "The FILE receive location \\StgFS01v7\xx*.* exhausted the network retry attempts. ".  back in Windows server 2003 you can get past this max concurent UNC limit by modifying these registry keys:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters\ MaxCmds
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\MaxMpxCt.
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\MaxWorkItems

These keys do not exist in windows 2008 r2, but i added them anyways to test (to both servers of course).  I still have the limit.  I tryed to use SMB 1.0 instead of version 2.0 that comes with server 2008 R2, followed this guide:
http://blog.korteksolutions.com/disable-smb-20-on-windows-server-2008/

still nothing.  This is not a problem with BizTalk, if the recieve locations are looking at the local hard drive, there is no problem.  only when the recieve locations are looking at a UNC path.  

Any help would be great, thanks,
Steven
0
Comment
Question by:sdmarek
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
4 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:itsmein
ID: 36548080
odd- according to the article here http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd296694(WS.10).aspx, this should work absolutely fine.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:sdmarek
ID: 36555090
I dont see any in that microsoft artical diffrent from the registry keys i already tryed.

thanks,
Steven
0
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
sdmarek earned 0 total points
ID: 36569883
I was forced to abandon my FileServer, add a hard drive to my BizTalk Servers' VM and have the recieve locations look localy.  This is no longer a high priority for me.  but still, If anyone has some idea on how to fix this UNC problem, i would really like to go back to using a centralized file server for my Biztalk Processing.

thanks,
Steven
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:sdmarek
ID: 37236415
giving up on BT recieving from a fileserver, and saving files to local BT server
0

Featured Post

Use Case: Protecting a Hybrid Cloud Infrastructure

Microsoft Azure is rapidly becoming the norm in dynamic IT environments. This document describes the challenges that organizations face when protecting data in a hybrid cloud IT environment and presents a use case to demonstrate how Acronis Backup protects all data.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The article will include the best Data Recovery Tools along with their Features, Capabilities, and their Download Links. Hope you’ll enjoy it and will choose the one as required by you.
A safe way to clean winsxs folder from your windows server 2008 R2 editions
This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application to properly change the service account username and\or password in situation where it may be necessary or where the password has been inadvertently change…
This tutorial will show how to configure a single USB drive with a separate folder for each day of the week. This will allow each of the backups to be kept separate preventing the previous day’s backup from being overwritten. The USB drive must be s…

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question