Solved

concurent UNC connection limit

Posted on 2011-09-16
4
2,138 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
I have a standard 2008 r2 server that i am using as a file server, and BizTalk 2009 running on a enterprise 2008 r2 server.  BizTalk has a couple thousand UNC recieve locations looking at the file server.  i can only have 512 of those recieve locations turned on at a time.  If i try and turn on more, they will eventaly fail with an error like: "The FILE receive location \\StgFS01v7\xx*.* exhausted the network retry attempts. ".  back in Windows server 2003 you can get past this max concurent UNC limit by modifying these registry keys:
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters\ MaxCmds
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\MaxMpxCt.
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\MaxWorkItems

These keys do not exist in windows 2008 r2, but i added them anyways to test (to both servers of course).  I still have the limit.  I tryed to use SMB 1.0 instead of version 2.0 that comes with server 2008 R2, followed this guide:
http://blog.korteksolutions.com/disable-smb-20-on-windows-server-2008/

still nothing.  This is not a problem with BizTalk, if the recieve locations are looking at the local hard drive, there is no problem.  only when the recieve locations are looking at a UNC path.  

Any help would be great, thanks,
Steven
0
Comment
Question by:sdmarek
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
4 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:itsmein
ID: 36548080
odd- according to the article here http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd296694(WS.10).aspx, this should work absolutely fine.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:sdmarek
ID: 36555090
I dont see any in that microsoft artical diffrent from the registry keys i already tryed.

thanks,
Steven
0
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
sdmarek earned 0 total points
ID: 36569883
I was forced to abandon my FileServer, add a hard drive to my BizTalk Servers' VM and have the recieve locations look localy.  This is no longer a high priority for me.  but still, If anyone has some idea on how to fix this UNC problem, i would really like to go back to using a centralized file server for my Biztalk Processing.

thanks,
Steven
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:sdmarek
ID: 37236415
giving up on BT recieving from a fileserver, and saving files to local BT server
0

Featured Post

Back Up Your Microsoft Windows Server®

Back up all your Microsoft Windows Server – on-premises, in remote locations, in private and hybrid clouds. Your entire Windows Server will be backed up in one easy step with patented, block-level disk imaging. We achieve RTOs (recovery time objectives) as low as 15 seconds.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Background Information Recently I have fixed file server permission issues for one of my client. The client has 1800 users and one Windows Server 2008 R2 domain joined file server with 12 TB of data, 250+ shared folders and the folder structure i…
A safe way to clean winsxs folder from your windows server 2008 R2 editions
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to enable the VMware\Hyper-V licensed feature of Backup Exec 2012. In addition, how to add a VMware server and configure a backup job. The first step is to acquire the necessary licen…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…

751 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question