[Okta Webinar] Learn how to a build a cloud-first strategyRegister Now

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 716
  • Last Modified:

KMS Class-C key not activating Win7


I KMS deployed with a Class-C key that is successfully activating Server 2008 and 2008 R2 servers. It is also configured with an Office 2010 key and activating those. Unfortunately, 25 Windows 7 Enterprise VMs are reporting "insufficient key count" when I try to activate them using the Volume Activation Management Tool.

The VMs are joined to AD, I have admin rights on them, and I am not getting WMI errors.

Any ideas? thanks.

Toby
The Software Licensing Service reported that the computer could not be activated. The count reported by your Key Management Service (KMS) is insufficient. Please contact your system administrator.

Open in new window

0
tobstah
Asked:
tobstah
  • 6
  • 5
1 Solution
 
cantorisCommented:
Those 25 PCs won't start activating until the 25th one has reported in to KMS to cross the threshold.  I presume they all have the KMS Client key on them rather than a MAK key?  I also presume DNS is OK since your servers have activated with it.

On your KMS Host server, run  Slmgr.vbs /dli
that should show what KMS believes to be the current activation count.  How near to 25 is it?
0
 
tobstahAuthor Commented:
I used the VAMT to send a WMI command to the 25 clients to activate, but it reports "insufficient count". /dli shows a key count of 21.
0
 
tobstahAuthor Commented:
I have a few dozen servers and workstations running Office 2010, so my count of 21 may be skewed.
0
What is SQL Server and how does it work?

The purpose of this paper is to provide you background on SQL Server. It’s your self-study guide for learning fundamentals. It includes both the history of SQL and its technical basics. Concepts and definitions will form the solid foundation of your future DBA expertise.

 
cantorisCommented:
Well it sounds as though 4 of those clients have not reported in. You probably need to add in some more to cross the threshold of 25.  Check the status of them all to ensure they do all have the right KMS Client Key.  (Use VAMT to Update the status of them.)
0
 
tobstahAuthor Commented:
I used VAMT to install the eky on all 25 via WMI. It reported success.
0
 
cantorisCommented:
Well KMS thinks there are only 21.

Do all 25 definitely have the GVLK key deployed to them?  I've not got access to VAMT this evening to recall if you can see which key has been deployed to each machine from it.
I know   slmgr.vbs /dlv   on each KMS client PC will show the KMS Client key's presence and licencing state.

Can all the machines resolve the special KMS DNS records and then have connectivity to report in to it?  Maybe some have received the licence from your pushing it to them but can't report back as they can't find the special SRV record to locate the KMS Host.

You could try (re)starting the Software Licensing service on them  (eg  net start sppsvc)  to see if that will give them a kick as well though I'm clutching at straws there.
0
 
tobstahAuthor Commented:
According to this troubleshooting article, the client count on the KMS server does not reflect the actual number of clients. The max is 50, which is *2x* the number of clients connected. I'm not quite sure how my install got to 21 clients based on that math. Perhaps I missed something?

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee939272.aspx
0
 
cantorisCommented:
No, it caches the number of clients connecting requesting activation within any 30day period, but it will not cache more than 2x the activation count - hence 50 is the max figure.
So it thinks it's only seen 21 different clients within 30 days.

From the page you linked, note that incorrect system imaging (ie not generalising the image) can cause identical machine IDs which causes multiple machines to appear as the same one to the KMS Host.
0
 
tobstahAuthor Commented:
Generalizing as in sysprep on the VM template?
0
 
cantorisCommented:
Yes, as in
sysprep /generalize

Open in new window

0
 
tobstahAuthor Commented:
I had duplicate SIDs on some of the VMs. Thanks everyone.
0

Featured Post

New feature and membership benefit!

New feature! Upgrade and increase expert visibility of your issues with Priority Questions.

  • 6
  • 5
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now