Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 352
  • Last Modified:

managed switch

i have been using HP managed switches for several years and have been happy with them, but when i looked into upgrading my main switch i was surprised at how much HP wanted ( $15,000 ) for a 120 port managed switch ( with one fiber module ).
any suggestions for good but less pricey managed switches?
0
JeffBeall
Asked:
JeffBeall
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • +1
3 Solutions
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
The 120 ports is what's increasing the cost. The E5412 is less than $4,000 but adding 24-port 10/100 modules increases it about $2000 per module. 10/100/100 adds $2,500 per module.

The only way I can think to lower the cost is to go with multiple small switches.

But that adds challenges too.

 
0
 
SouljaCommented:
You could get 3 48 port Cisco 3750x's and stack them. That would be 144 ports and up to 12 fiber capable ports.
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Excellent idea.

The only (potential) downside would be the relatively slower backplane/inter-switch speed.

HP claims 758gbps for the 5412 zl while the 3750X is 160gbps internal and 64gbps external.
0
Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

 
SouljaCommented:
@don

That's a huge difference. If the cost of the 3750's are within thousands of the HP, I would go with the HP for sure. I guess is all comes down to what the author is willing to pay.
0
 
SouljaCommented:
$15k is not that bad of a price for what you are getting on that HP. Between the two options above I guess it comes to what is your priority ports/dollar or performance/dollar.
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Yeah. I guess it comes down to "you get what you pay for." :-)
0
 
JeffBeallAuthor Commented:
i really love the hp switch, and can't complain. i just haven't had to buy a switch in so long, I'm suffering from sticker shock.
from your description, it does sound like the hp is better. i guess i was just "shopping" other brands to compare prices.
i was asking the question because i only have practical experience with HP, and was wondering if there were other brands that were as good as hp but not as pricey.
0
 
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
IMHO, the HP is a good lower-cost option to Cisco.

Lower than that, I don't have any first-hand knowledge.
0
 
SouljaCommented:
I agree, the HP is a good alternative to Cisco.
0
 
eeRootCommented:
You could get (3) Cisco WS-C2960S-48TS-S and stack them.  The 2960's are bit lower end then the 3750's, but they work well for end user connections.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6406/prod_models_comparison.html

The non-POE versions are a bit over $2,000.  So that would only cost you around $6,500 when all is done.
0
 
JeffBeallAuthor Commented:
thanks for the help
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now