?
Solved

Huge Outlook Mailboxes

Posted on 2011-09-20
12
Medium Priority
?
394 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
I have a broad-scope kind of question, regarding Outlook mailboxes, for IT managers out there.

Our users have been corresponding with biz partners for the last decade, predominantly through Outlook.  We have some mailboxes that exceed 20 GB; each mailbox is cached on the user's workstation.  Additionally, many users need to access/share multiple mailboxes, and since they use Outlook Anywhere this means that we have several HUGE cached profiles on one laptop.

I can't demand that my users delete their business info... on the other hand, I don't understand how some businesses can afford to globally dictate that mailboxes remain under 1 GB (for example).  Any suggestions out there for mailbox management?

(We use Exchange 2007 and Outlook 2007)
Thanks!
BF
0
Comment
Question by:cuiinc
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • +3
12 Comments
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:Paul MacDonald
ID: 36569432
I force 90% of my users to maintain mailboxes under 50MB.  The rest have limits under 200MB.  They are encouraged to use PST files to archive old mail, and simply delete anything of no use.  No one needs access to gigabytes of old mail.
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Govvy
ID: 36569450
Most enterprise firms will use an archiving solution such as Symantec Enterprise Vault to ensure management of mailbox sizes and performance on Exchange servers
0
 
LVL 35

Accepted Solution

by:
Paul MacDonald earned 750 total points
ID: 36569461
...and Exchange 2010 has archiving built in (if you buy the licenses for it).
0
Making Bulk Changes to Active Directory

Watch this video to see how easy it is to make mass changes to Active Directory from an external text file without using complicated scripts.

 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:Neil Russell
Neil Russell earned 750 total points
ID: 36570019
"They are encouraged to use PST files to archive..."  WOW!!

You actually Encourage users to use a PST file?

Upgrade to exchange 2010 and use the inbuilt archive solution.  Storage is about as cheap as a box of cornflakes nowadays and I'd rather manage an exchange system with a few TB of storage than manage a CEO with a corrupt PST file because I wouldnt let him use my cheap disk space!
0
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:Paul MacDonald
ID: 36570045
I encourage my users to use PST files because it encourages them to think seriously about what they need to keep and what they don't.  If I just backed everything up, they'd just keep everything.
0
 
LVL 37

Expert Comment

by:Neil Russell
ID: 36570078
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:cuiinc
ID: 36570173
Thanks for all the responses so far.

Personal archiving is definitely not an option for us, as we need to keep everything secure, backed up, and centrally managed.  I will definitely check out Exchange 2010 archiving solutions.  How well does this work with remote users (smtp over http)?
0
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:Paul MacDonald
ID: 36570183
E2010 should keep the data available for remote users.  It's a good solution, just remember that you have to pay extra for it.
0
 
LVL 37

Expert Comment

by:Neil Russell
ID: 36572166
With Exchange 2010 you can also see and search the archives using Outlook Web App (OWA).
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Gerald Connolly
ID: 36576463
I force 90% of my users to maintain mailboxes under 50MB.  The rest have limits under 200MB.  They are encouraged to use PST files to archive old mail, and simply delete anything of no use.  No one needs access to gigabytes of old mail.

@paulmacd - what an old fashioned attitude to users needs. i agree with @Neilsr storage is soo cheap why are you sticking to 1990's attitudes towards mail use?  Why do you think you know what users want to do with their email and the amount of time is wasted just trying to stay under some arbitary storage quota.

i can't believe there are still system managers out there who are still so short sighted!
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:Paul Solovyovsky
ID: 36578450
I've been deployment Enterprise Vault for a while and it has some advantages over Exchange 2010 especially if you're thinking about E-Discovery.  Exchange 2010 native tools aren't that great and are not really designed to be used for legal matters from what I found.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:cuiinc
ID: 36588681
could have elucidated a bit further...
0

Featured Post

Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell® is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Microsoft Jet database engine errors can crop up out of nowhere to disrupt the working of the Exchange server. Decoding why a particular error occurs goes a long way in determining the right solution for it.
As a matter of fact, Outlook OST files are of much importance in relation to Exchange mailbox. OST files are independent as they are simply copy of data of a user’s mailbox on Exchange Server. Though, if the server’s status is changed or it is dama…
This video shows how to quickly and easily add an email signature for all users on Exchange 2016. The resulting signature is applied on a server level by Exchange Online. The email signature template has been downloaded from: www.mail-signatures…
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an antispam), the admini…
Suggested Courses

588 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question