Solved

Filemaker VS SQL

Posted on 2011-09-22
6
1,144 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-12
Hi Experts!!

Just need some advice for a company that is growing globally that needs a database system.

So we currently have filemaker and were growing bigger with bigger needs. Right now i see filemaker as a great "RAD" and cost effective in comparison to other common platforms.

However I think for scalability and accessibility we probably have to move to SQL?

What are your thoughts on FM vs SQL for a company thats expanding globally and turning out to have more processors (more like ERP).

Cheers

Jedi
0
Comment
Question by:J3D1-KN1G1-1t
6 Comments
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:khairil
ID: 36585791
Hi,

MS MSQL is the way you should go. MS SQL is enterprise level database, it have a lot more features and reliability compared to FileMaker. MS SQL offer a lot tools to manage your data, do business intelligent and reporting and also analyzing your data. More over, MS SQL capable of handling very BIG data and process it in shorter time. Of course you have to go detail to know what it is, http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/en/us/product-info/whats-new.aspx

However, you do not have to waste your investment on FileMaker, FileMaker still can be use as RAD tools to generate reports. Here is a bit on using FileMaker with external database such MS SQL or MySQL, http://www.filemaker.com/support/technologies/sql.html

0
 
LVL 12

Accepted Solution

by:
North2Alaska earned 167 total points
ID: 36587036
Yes, FileMaker can be used as a RAD, but the challenge is two fold.  First, FileMaker has interface objects that are not available in a AMP (Apache, MySQL, PHP) type system.  So, sometimes it is extra effort to reproduce these objects (most can be done with Web 2.0 and/or javascript, but it is an extra effort).  The second, FM does things differently, so some things don't translate very well.  For example, Table Occurrences, two way joins, multiple relationships between TOs.  All of these can be reproduced in SQL, but again with an extra effort.

I think the real question in my mind is what resources are available to you. If you already have smart, competent FM people, if you already have a system in place and have software and hardware in place, I would think twice about replacing FM.  It can scale to a degree and web access is part of the package.

On the other hand, if I were starting a brand new project that required the type of things you are talking about, I would go with AMP.  And on the Mac its all there, ready to go, so its easy.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:dportas
dportas earned 166 total points
ID: 36589853
FileMaker is an application development tool. SQL is a type of DBMS. Those are different things. What exactly do you want to compare? Are you considering switching just the DBMS platform or do you want a new development environment as well?
0
Three Reasons Why Backup is Strategic

Backup is strategic to your business because your data is strategic to your business. Without backup, your business will fail. This white paper explains why it is vital for you to design and immediately execute a backup strategy to protect 100 percent of your data.

 

Author Comment

by:J3D1-KN1G1-1t
ID: 36778324
Hi guys sorry for the late response got caught up at work......

I realized I have a made a mistake in my question after reading your comments.

My actual question should have been Filemaker vs. SQL with frontend app C#.Net

Thank you for all your responses


Kharil - Our Filemaker is very old it first created about 9-10 years, so fresh new system is currently on the priority list

North2Alaska - Very interesting response, thanks for the insight! we actually don't have
competent FM users instead just have users. The new IT recruit are all SQL familiar.


dportas - I am considering to switch to SQL with front end app to be C#.

So let me ask a question with a question then...

Filemaker vs. SQL with C#.Net ?

0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:North2Alaska
ID: 36812648
My personal bias is to avoid anything Microsoft as much as possible.  So, I would go with Apache, MySQL and PHP.  This is a great design environment.
0
 
LVL 13

Assisted Solution

by:khairil
khairil earned 167 total points
ID: 36812726
You have few choice here:
1. Continue using FM, which need training for your new recruit to be familiar with FM. It will take a while but can be done.
2. Use C# to connect to FM database using ODBC, different version using different version of ODBC, http://www.filemaker.co.uk/support/technologies/odbc.html
3. Use C# for new system with MS SQL as database backend. At same time, try convert old FM apps to C# application and export data from FM to MS SQL (you may need to allocate some resources for this excercise like extra tools, people)
0

Featured Post

Free Webinar: AWS Backup & DR

Join our upcoming webinar with experts from AWS, CloudBerry Lab, and the Town of Edgartown IT to discuss best practices for simplifying online backup management and cutting costs.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
SQL Server Resume 5 46
MS SQL Server Management Studio R2 4 32
SQL 2012 Instance Problem 3 59
Estimating my database size 7 16
I have a large data set and a SSIS package. How can I load this file in multi threading?
A company’s centralized system that manages user data, security, and distributed resources is often a focus of criminal attention. Active Directory (AD) is no exception. In truth, it’s even more likely to be targeted due to the number of companies …
This videos aims to give the viewer a basic demonstration of how a user can query current session information by using the SYS_CONTEXT function
Via a live example, show how to setup several different housekeeping processes for a SQL Server.

733 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question