Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of remmett70
remmett70Flag for United States of America

asked on

Advice on cost friendly plan to virtualize servers

I currently have 11 old PE 2650/2850/1750 servers that need to be replaced.  What they were doesn't seem important because the previous person seemed to just throw more hardware at an issue instead of fixing the issue so the utilization of each is very low.  What I am expecting to have at the end for VM is

1 DC, 1 Exchange 2010, 2 SQL 2008, 2 Application Servers, 1 File Server, 1 AV/WSUS, 2 Terminal Servers (20 users).  All 2008 R2.

The current equipment is using about 450GB of hard drive outside of the OS partitions so I don't need more than a couple TB of storage which seems to make SAN/NAS not the best options.

Is a small server with a 4core Xeon enough, or does it need to hyper thread to get 8 threads, or even dual processors.  Or do I need multiple servers.

How much RAM do I need.

Free vSpere or Hyper-V, or vSphere Essentials.  Then after that, how do I back all of this up.  I do have 6 2TB USB drives I use for backup now.

I can use any idea at this point.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of jojo_OR
jojo_OR

The questions is, do you have the money for redundancy.  Will you have storage located on a lower end SAN?  Will you want two VM servers for local redundancy.  Do you want offsite redundancy?  How many total users do you have?  How many mailboxes, what type of database, what type of applications etc.  Most vendors will have their tech sales rep on had to help size your setup.  You'll need to figure out if you want in terms of design and business need.
If each R2 Server is Given at least 4GB, that's approx 40GB of RAM required, so FREE ESXi 5.0 maynot give you enough RAM. You could consider FREE ESXi 4.1 (no vRAM limit)
Avatar of remmett70

ASKER

@hanccocka, I have read that 6-8GB ram per VM is a decent guideline for sizing?

getting servers with over 6GB without going to the top models seems to be an issue.  Might be better off going with 3 single Xeon Servers with 16-24GB.  and dropping to Enterprise vs Datacenter.

Does Hyper-V have any better backup options?

@jojo I would like redundancy (not HA) though, and eventually some DR capability.  That is more than likely cost prohibitive at the present time.   Only about 50 users, very low utilization across to board on all servers.  11 servers and 450 GB or data storage used, including a weeks worth of SQL backups and Exchange backups.

We actually usually work on 6-8GB per Core. Memory is often the bottleneck, not the CPUs.

Hyper-V has less backup options, as a later comer in the market.

Backup Exec and Replication will give you DR, you can use it to Replicate VMs every 15 minutes if you like to another ESX server.

Essentials would give you licensing for three servers.
I already own Backup Exec, Is there just an agent to add to backup vsphere.

Kind of annoying or seems like a racket.  The processors will handle the load, but the RAM is low, to get the ram up need to add more processors, which then go under utilized.
Unless you use ESXi 4.1 for Free.

If you use Backup Exec, with an Agent in the VM, it's slow, and not the most effecient way of backup.
thank you for the input.  wonder what our vendor will recommend.  I will have a better idea on their configuration.  
Given the number of VMs, Windows Datacenter for a single CPU host is the most cost effective way to go to license Windows. A quad core should be fine. You can put 48 or 96 GB of RAM in there with a single processor configuration. You would still need to work out storage.