Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1418
  • Last Modified:

Encase Forensic 6.xx Boolean "AND" Keyword Search

I am using EnCase Forensic 6.18 to keyword search data from a desktop computer. My keyword list has 4 basic terms and are all similar to:

(Term1 OR Term2) AND (Term3 OR Term4 OR Term5 OR Term6)

I have broken down these terms to the point where I first search for Term1 and Term2, and then in a second and third round of searches, apply Terms3-6 to the results of either Term1 or Term2.

However, I would like to not spend my day babysitting the machine. Is there a way to get the same results in a single search or action using EnCase 6.xx? Complex Grep statement or nested keyword list? Anything?
0
ajholk
Asked:
ajholk
  • 3
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
ajholkAuthor Commented:
To clarify, I can run Term3-6 in a single subsearch against the same statement's Term1 and Term2. However, each attaditional statement needs an additional seperate subsearch. So if I have 4  statements in my keyword list, I would need to run 5 searches, one to isolate the primary terms and then 4 subsearches.

I'm trying to find a way to do it all at once.
0
 
ChopOMaticCommented:
Since you're using EnCase, you can always run the separate searches, then craft a condition to merge them. Will that work, or must it be run in a single search?
0
 
btanExec ConsultantCommented:
I am thinking to optimise the keyword, we may want to see if there are familiar contextual information on them e.g. they are numbers? ip address? words or sentences? etc. This file share some useful grep expression for some common forensic categories.

http://homepage.mac.com/adonismac/Textware/forensic/forensic_Grep_Expressions.pdf

Running multiple search separately is also another means like ChopOMatic has advised. I am thinking if we can drill down the search space to suspicious place for high level first cut to see if can hit jackpot but eventually for completeness we will have to do the lengthy process. Going for highly dense or commonly used storage location and kickstart the search

http://windirstat.info/
http://www.uderzo.it/main_products/space_sniffer/index.html

ideally, we can simplify the search by breaking the "big" search string. But I am not grep expert

(Term1 OR Term2) AND (Term3 OR Term4 OR Term5 OR Term6)
0
Who's Defending Your Organization from Threats?

Protecting against advanced threats requires an IT dream team – a well-oiled machine of people and solutions working together to defend your organization. Download our resource kit today to learn more about the tools you need to build you IT Dream Team!

 
ajholkAuthor Commented:
Running seperate searches and then crafting a condition to merge them will certainly. However, as far as timing goes, it's about the same as what I am doing now with primary and sub-searches.

Since in my case the search terms are words (alphabet-only) and I need to be able to isolate files and contain both words regardless of distance between then or order of appearance, grep has limited ability in this area.

However, I'll continue to work with both ideas and see if I can find the best of both worlds.

Thanks.
0
 
ChopOMaticCommented:
Are you searching only active files, or must you include slack space, unallocated, etc.?

If only active files, you could download dtSearch. Index the files you want to search, then search to your heart's content. Instant results. Easy boolean, etc.
0
 
ajholkAuthor Commented:
I hadn't considered DtSearch, but it is certainly an option. I'll have to get some metrics on how long it would take to index 1.5 TB of dekstop data to see if the option is in play.
0

Featured Post

Become an Android App Developer

Ready to kick start your career in 2018? Learn how to build an Android app in January’s Course of the Month and open the door to new opportunities.

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now